My Friend's Math Talent: A Story of Amazement

  • Thread starter Thread starter gary350
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the extraordinary mathematical abilities of a participant's friend, who can perform complex calculations in his head almost instantaneously. Participants explore the nature of such talents, including potential connections to savant syndrome, different cognitive styles, and personal anecdotes related to mathematical skills and education.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their friend's ability to solve complex math problems quickly, noting that the answers come to him automatically.
  • Another participant mentions that individuals with savant syndrome often exhibit similar mathematical feats, referencing a BBC documentary about a person with exceptional calendar math skills.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of synesthesia, where individuals associate numbers with sensory experiences, potentially aiding their mathematical abilities.
  • The Tractenberg arithmetic system is introduced as a method that can help anyone perform multiplication without traditional summation techniques.
  • A participant shares a personal story about their experience with math in school, contrasting traditional and new math approaches, and highlighting the importance of correct answers over methods used.
  • Another participant reflects on their own cognitive style, emphasizing visual thinking over verbal processing, and shares their experiences in engineering and problem-solving.
  • Temple Grandin's work on visual thinking is mentioned, suggesting a connection between different cognitive styles and mathematical abilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of admiration and skepticism regarding the uniqueness of the mathematical talent discussed. While some find it amazing, others argue that such abilities are rare but not entirely unique. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications and definitions of these abilities.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various personal experiences and anecdotal evidence without reaching a consensus on the nature or implications of the mathematical abilities discussed. The conversation touches on educational methods and cognitive styles, indicating a range of perspectives on how individuals process mathematical information.

gary350
Messages
292
Reaction score
83
I have a friend that can do math problems in his head as fast as I can read the numbers off of paper. I once wrote a 60 number math problem, add, multiply, square, divide, square, subtract, square root, multiply, etc., 60 different numbers with a lots of 6 digit numbers on paper. I read him the numbers as fast as I could he had the correct answer 1/4 second after reading the last number. I ask him, how can you do that? He said, I don't know the answers just come to me automatic. He said, you say the number, the answer pops into my head, then I tell you the answer.

I took math every year in college, I took every math class except imaginary number. I have never been about to add 2 digit numbers in my head. LOL. I can do math on paper or calculator but not I my head.

There should be a special job, or special place in this world for this guy. What do you think? Is this amazing or not???
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Of course, this is quite amazing. Often people with savant syndrome can do these feats of math. However there is also a class of people who can do this with even more creative problems.

There was a BBC documentary one time that investigated this guys calendar math skills. He wanted to know whether he was a savant or something else. After testing the researchers told him he was in that special class. They had given him a calendar problem that was not algorithmic and yet he was able to rattle off the dates as fast as he could speak.

Some folks with this special math ability are synthetes ie they associate numbers with colors, shapes or smells or some other sensory phenomena and then use it to compute the answers. However its not clear how they can do this and its completely different for each person. The only common denominator is that the areas neighbor one another in the brain and there seems to be cross communication going on between these areas giving rise to this special skill.

There is also the Tractenberg arithmetic rules which can be taught to anyone that allows you to do multiplication of large number without the need for summing the intermediate results. Summing is embedded in the method. The original goal of the system was to eliminate use of multiplication tables and the associated method of multiplying with each digit and then summing the shifted intermediate values to get the answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trachtenberg_system





There's a beautiful movie called Gifted where the young star learned the system for the movie. SHe portrayed an undiscovered math prodigy protected by her uncle from the external forces of expectation and failure who had destroyed her mother leading to her mother committing suicide.

Personally when I was in elementary school, I wanted to be smart and would sometimes compute small numbers and recite the answerback to someone who challenged me. The trick was I'd ask the kid a question and while they were thinking of the answer I did the computation and surprised them with the answer. I did this a couple of times and then felt it was better to quit while I was ahead.

I did have a friend who could in fact do this but I didn't meet him until highschool. He was an MAA champion and got on the MAA team for a competition in Europe with the British and Russians. Sadly, the US team got trounced because their training was on multiple choice test questions whereas the British and Russian kids had fill in the blanks type problems. This occurred sometime in 1967 or 68 but I never knew when. My friend later told me the story of what happened.

There's also a BBC documentary of kids training for the international math olypiad. Many of these kids are savants in math. Others are autistic and focus on math.

https://watchdocumentaries.com/beautiful-young-minds/

More on savants:



and this one on Daniel Tammet, a synthete savant who learned Icelandic in two weeks:

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
gary350 said:
There should be a special job, or special place in this world for this guy. What do you think? Is this amazing or not???
I think "amazing" is quite strong since this is a very well known phenomenon and not even remotely unique. Rare, to be sure, but ...
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
I'd like to see any type of math savant master the symbolic computations in QFT... :oldfrown:
 
The first video reminds me of new math. My son was flunking new math in high school. I showed him the math I learned and he said, that is so easy. I told him to do his math on scratch paper then write the answers on his class quiz and tests. He got 100 on all his test but teacher marked all his answers wrong because he did not do it the new math way. We move him to a different school and he made straight A in most glasses. He got very high score on his ACT test they only care about correct answers not how you got the answer.

The second 2 videos remind me of me. I think in pictures, not words. I read very slow it took me 7 years to get an engineering degree in college. I had to take several classes 2 times. I would have never passed college English if I had not gone to tooter class every day. I flunked college English 3 times. I can't spell words but I can see pictures of words in my head and read the letters. Before college I took Electronics in a trade school. 1973 I had a job working for Pacific Press & Shear Corp., after working there about 6 month I went on the road as Service Engineer. I visited several 1000 factories to service our equipment, I got to see what every factory was making and how it was being made including tool and die machine shops. All of that is still in my head like several 1000 videos. I changed jobs a few times then took a job as design engineer for 20 years. If a customer came to us and had parts and drawings and wanted 5000 parts every 8 hour shift I could have it figured out in my head in about 1 minutes. I can run machines and assembly line in my head to see how well it works and work out the bugs in a few minutes. After that we built the tooling and made parts. I don't think that is anything special but other people do.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
gary350 said:
The second 2 videos remind me of me. I think in pictures, not words. I read very slow it took me 7 years to get an engineering degree in college. I had to take several classes 2 times. I would have never passed college English if I had not gone to tooter class every day. I flunked college English 3 times. I can't spell words but I can see pictures of words in my head and read the letters. Before college I took Electronics in a trade school. 1973 I had a job working for Pacific Press & Shear Corp., after working there about 6 month I went on the road as Service Engineer. I visited several 1000 factories to service our equipment, I got to see what every factory was making and how it was being made including tool and die machine shops. All of that is still in my head like several 1000 videos. I changed jobs a few times then took a job as design engineer for 20 years. If a customer came to us and had parts and drawings and wanted 5000 parts every 8 hour shift I could have it figured out in my head in about 1 minutes. After that we built the tooling and made parts. I don't think that is anything special but other people do.
I came across an interesting author and book considering the topic of people who think in pictures. If you look up Temple Grandin, I think she has a relatively new book called "Visual Thinking." It is about the difference modes of thinking people have. And as between the non-verbal thinkers, there are the abstract thinkers and the picture thinkers. Anyway, thought it might be of interest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
Haborix said:
I came across an interesting author and book considering the topic of people who think in pictures. If you look up Temple Grandin, I think she has a relatively new book called "Visual Thinking." It is about the difference modes of thinking people have. And as between the non-verbal thinkers, there are the abstract thinkers and the picture thinkers. Anyway, thought it might be of interest.
I know about Temple Grandin. There was a movie about her 30 years ago. I did not know about her books.



I had a high school teacher that kept me after class, she wanted to know why I only answered 80 of the 100 questions on the test. I said, time ran out, I read slow. She thought speed reading had something to do with how smart people are. She noticed I had 80 out or 80 correct but she thought I should be in a special class for retards. I told her, I probably know the correct answers for the other 20 questions so she let me finish the test and I got 100. I told her, I see words but it takes me a whole second to give each word a name. I am amazed how fast other people read, I can't do that.

The man that I know that can add numbers as fast as you can read them use to drill water wells for people in 3rd world countries that had to walk or drive 30 miles every day to get water. He helped people learn to grow food. He did that for 15 years then he became a carpenter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban, gleem and Astronuc
jedishrfu said:
They had given him a calendar problem that was not algorithmic

I didn't know there could be non-algorithmic calendar problems.
 
Sadly, I don't remember the problem they gave the guy. It was something like list every year since some starting year where some date like February 28th fell on a Tuesday where you had to be aware of leap years and anti-leap centuries and leap four hundred years.

It meant the guy recomputed each answer. I remeber he started slow and then sped up listing the dates and they concluded that he was a genius not a savant. He supposedly gained the calendar and arithmetic talent later in life and was perplexed by it.
 
  • #10
gary350 said:
, I see words but it takes me a whole second to give each word a name. I am amazed how fast other people read, I can't do that.
Same here. I hated courses that required a lot of reading like social sciences and literature. It took too much time to get decent grades in those courses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gary350 and jedishrfu
  • #11
"I told her, I see words but it takes me a whole second to give each word a name. I am amazed how fast other people read, I can't do that."

I feel for you.
I'm at the other extreme: Often, I don't consciously 'read' as words, sentences, even paragraphs, but devour text at a few saccades per page, sorta convert it to a fast-forward movie 'on the fly'...

Upside, I'll happily trawl a shelf of technical books, confident I'll spot anything 'relevant' and/or 'interesting'...
Down-side, my 'abstracts' hit a 'glass ceiling' at mild calculus...
 
  • #12
gary350 said:
There should be a special job, or special place in this world for this guy. What do you think? Is this amazing or not???
Yes, it is amazing, and 60-70 years ago, there was a special job for people like this. The job title was “computer.” Unfortunately for your friend, electronic computers have taken the place of flesh and blood computers, and they can do billions of calculations per second, not dozens.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_(occupation)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #13
Not to worry just a few EMP events and the job opportunities for savants and people with sliderules or abacii will be plentiful not to mention artists, musicians, actors and storytellers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #14
gary350 said:
I have a friend that can do math problems in his head as fast as I can read the numbers off of paper.
I worked with an old engineer (80 years old!) who could do relatively simple calculations mentally and tell me the proper result before I could do the same with a hand calculator.
He always finished first and never made a mistake.

He did not have any special job, but while working together, he could do mental accurate calculations each time an engineering estimate (horsepower, BTUh, area, cost, pipe diameter, material, duct size, etc.) was needed during technical meetings.
 
  • #15
When you get a job after college you use some of what you learned and what you never use you slowly forget. Use it or loose it. I love technology and I love to learn. Some people read paper back books, some read novels, I read technology books. I am having fun online with a math challenge forum. I have forgotten a lot of math but it is all coming back. Math is fun.

100_7251.JPG
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu and Lnewqban
  • #16
For decades I would habitually do calculations in my head. I'd do prime factorizations of numbers that I saw. It was just to occupy my mind.

I can always do simple things faster than someone with a calculator. It's just practice and basic tricks. The same situations occur over and over again and one memorizes intermediate results that are often seen.

I suppose idiot savants who do nothing all day but factor prime numbers get to be pretty good at it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #17
4-figure log etc tables...
I'd a precious book of 5-figure tables, but it got 'borrowed'...
And we were so jealous of the kid who'd 'inherited' a big, circular 'Engineering' slide-rule: It never 'fell off the end'.
FWIW, nor did mine, which had Pi-offset markings on reverse...
But a neighbour's 'student exchange' girl could work an abacus faster than 'blitz-backgammon'...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K