My physics exam preparations feel like rote actions, I'm not understanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter yo yo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Preparing for exams can be challenging, especially when grappling with dynamic topics in physics. The discussion highlights frustration with the reliance on Newton's equations for problem-solving, leading to a feeling of superficial understanding. There is a desire for deeper comprehension of physics concepts and how they explain the world, rather than just applying formulas. The sentiment reflects a common experience among students, questioning whether this struggle is typical and at what level of physics one can achieve a more profound understanding. The conversation suggests that as one progresses in their studies, the ability to connect concepts across different fields may enhance understanding. Additionally, it humorously notes that late-night study sessions can lead to existential thoughts, indicating the importance of rest in the learning process.
yo yo
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
i`m preparing for my exams and now, at 2am, i solve problems on dynamic topic. i try to analyse constructions, write some equations, but it doesn`t work at all. everything works out only when i just write down newton equations and projecting them and it feels like a meaningless exercise!

like, i lit just list forces, project, and solve… nothing else. is it school physics bug? will it be fixed? when?

i had hoped that physics would explain how the world works and why things are the way they are. i know that this is only the beginning, and perhaps as i move on to more complex concepts, i will begin to analyze and understand more deeply, rather than just projecting forces, but is this feeling normal? And what level of physics do i need to reach in order to feel confidently aware of how the world works in general?

(i also study other branches of physics and other sciences and am not limited to school materials only. I'm deducing(idk how to sy it) all the formulas, not memorizing them)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you are on the way to actually Learning things. The next step is likely when you can spot similarities in different fields and mentally tie them together.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and yo yo
I think having negative existential thoughts at 2am is usually a good indication that you should get some sleep!
 
  • Like
Likes yo yo, gwnorth, Tom.G and 1 other person
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top