Naimark extension for continuous variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Naimark extension is applicable to continuous variables, similar to its application in discrete variables, as established in Theorem 4 of the referenced arXiv paper (1110.6815). The Rigged Hilbert Space formalism is essential for handling continuous variables, serving as a limit of the finite case. Accurate measurement of a system's position in the context of the Naimark extension requires avoiding direct measurement of the ancilla's position, as it lacks eigenvectors in the Hilbert space. Instead, one should measure another observable of the ancilla that possesses eigenvectors within the Hilbert space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Naimark extension in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Rigged Hilbert Space formalism
  • Knowledge of projective measurements in quantum systems
  • Concept of observables and eigenvectors in Hilbert spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Naimark extension for continuous variables in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the Rigged Hilbert Space formalism in detail
  • Research projective measurements and their applications in quantum systems
  • Learn about observables and eigenvectors in the context of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum measurement theory, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts.

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,378
For discrete variables, a POVM on a system can be thought of as a projective measurement on the system coupled to an apparatus. This is called the Naimark extension. Is this also true for continuous variables?

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6815 (Theorem 4, p10)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say yes.

Continuous variables are best handled by the Rigged Hilbert Space formalism which is simply a limit of the finite case.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
So presumably if I would like to make an "accurate" measurement of a system's position, in the Naimark extension I should not measure the position of the ancilla? The reason I'm thinking this is that the position of the ancilla will not have any eigenvectors in the Hilbert space, so one must measure some other observable of the ancilla that has eigenvectors in the Hilbert space?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 122 ·
5
Replies
122
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K