I Relativistic hidden variable quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the impossibility of covariant deterministic nonlocal hidden-variable theories in relativistic quantum mechanics, as established by Gisin's paper. Critics argue against Gisin's assumptions, with Laudisa providing a counterpoint, while Oldofredi defends Gisin's position. The conversation also explores the implications of relativistic Bohmian mechanics, particularly concerning causality and the definition of proper time. Participants debate the validity of redefining fundamental concepts in light of quantum mechanics, questioning whether such changes undermine established principles of relativity. Overall, the dialogue highlights ongoing tensions between quantum theory and relativistic frameworks.
  • #121
A. Neumaier said:
But (for a curve) this tangent vector is unique only up to a (positive or negative) factor.
One way to fix this factor is indeed to fix the parametrization. But the point is that it is not the only way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
Demystifier said:
One way to fix this factor is indeed to fix the parametrization. But the point is that it is not the only way.
So how do you fix it without getting a spurious sign in your ds?
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #123
A. Neumaier said:
So how do you fix it without getting a spurious sign in your ds?
If the curve is oriented (which is a much weaker requirement than that it is parameterized), then the sign is chosen such that ##s## increases in the direction of orientation. In my case, the orientation at each point is defined by the direction of the vector ##V^{\mu}##, to which the curve is tangent. Note also that in my paper ##\Omega## in Eq. (111) is positive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
80
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K