Nature vs. Nurture: The Role of Environment in Shaping Moral Behavior

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter venger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature vs. nurture debate, specifically focusing on how environmental factors and brain activity may influence moral behavior and the distinction between ethical and unethical individuals. Participants explore theoretical and conceptual aspects of morality, ethics, and the potential biological underpinnings of behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether there are identifiable behavioral or brain activity differences between individuals who engage in unethical behavior and those who do not, pondering the role of free will.
  • Another participant asserts that ethical behavior is inherently good and contrasts it with unethical behavior, warning against the complexities of defining "righteous" individuals.
  • Some participants reference articles discussing physical brain differences between "normal" individuals and criminals, suggesting a potential link between brain abnormalities and behavior.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about observable physical differences in brain structure due to individual actions, suggesting that external factors like drug use or brain damage may influence behavior instead.
  • A participant emphasizes the significant impact of social circumstances and environment on moral development, using the example of identical twins raised in vastly different conditions to illustrate this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the influence of environment versus inherent traits on moral behavior. There is no consensus on whether physical brain differences can be linked to moral behavior, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which nature or nurture plays a role.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on anecdotal evidence or references to external articles, and there are unresolved assumptions about the definitions of morality and ethical behavior. The discussion also touches on complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors without reaching definitive conclusions.

venger
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Is there anything that can distinguish a person who likes to steal, cheat the government, etc from honest people in the way they behave or brain activity. Or is it free will to obsess? In general, what is the foundation of finding righteous and evil people?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There is an easy way to tell. People who act ethically are good, and those who do not are evil, no matter if their acts are not prosecutable under law or forbidden by moral code. Be very careful in trying to define "righteous" people because the most unspeakable crimes are often committed by people hiding under a cloak of morality and religious probity.
 
I remember an article that discussed the physical differences between the brains of normal people and criminals.
I can not remember when or where I found the article but if you do a search on "brain abnormalities and criminals" you will get a lot of hits.
 
sas3 said:
I remember an article that discussed the physical differences between the brains of normal people and criminals.
I can not remember when or where I found the article but if you do a search on "brain abnormalities and criminals" you will get a lot of hits.

Good google suggestion. I tried it and came up with a pretty good read on the subject here:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=33EF147A-E7F2-99DF-3696EF69D814FCFF
November 29, 2006
The Violent Brain
Violent behavior never erupts from a single cause. Rather it appears to result from a complex web of related factors, some genetic and others environmental.
 
I wouldn’t believe so... Well not noticeably different. I don't think you would be able to see a physical difference in brain matter or brain shape due to actions that an individual has taken. Though because of drug use, or brain damage the shape of the brain may be different and this may result in lack of judgments/ideas.
 
a mind is shaped by circumstances.
if you are a good person who helps those less fortunate and lead a good life...
do not be too proud of that. Its mostly the social situations and environment that shapes you.

here is an example.
identical twins are split at birth. 1 goes to a loving, caring family which lives in a good neighborhood.
the other twin is brought up in a poor family with abuse both mentally and physically from his foster parents. he lives in a high crime area.

thinking like this you can easily picture 1 of them as a successfull person and the other a hardened criminal.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
40
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K