Near-Death Experience: Investigating Theoretical Implications

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a reported near-death experience (NDE) involving a comatose patient who accurately described events occurring during his resuscitation, including details about his dentures and the CPR process. This anecdote raises questions about the nature of consciousness and the potential compatibility of perceptual and metaphysical realities. Despite the compelling nature of such experiences, many participants argue that they remain anecdotal and lack scientific validation, primarily attributing NDEs to brain-induced hallucinations due to hypoxia. The conversation highlights a divide between anecdotal evidence and scientific inquiry, questioning why further investigation into NDEs is not more prevalent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of near-death experiences (NDEs)
  • Familiarity with hypoxia and its effects on the brain
  • Knowledge of the scientific method and the role of anecdotal evidence
  • Awareness of the implications of consciousness studies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physiological effects of hypoxia on brain function
  • Explore existing studies on near-death experiences and their implications
  • Investigate the scientific community's response to anecdotal evidence in research
  • Examine the relationship between consciousness and metaphysical theories
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for researchers in consciousness studies, medical professionals interested in the implications of NDEs, philosophers exploring metaphysical realities, and anyone curious about the intersection of science and anecdotal evidence.

  • #91


ZapperZ said:
I don't get it. Finding out "what it is" is not the same as "studying the NDE scientifically"? There are other ways to find out what something is unambiguously that everyone can agree on? Really?
Strawman.
I'm all for studying it. Check the fact that I've cited extensive scientific studies of various aspects of NDE! The more we study it, the more we will realize that (i) the brain isn't always reliable (ii) we are easily fooled and (iii) that these NDE observations do need any "supernatural" explanations.
Neurology is already way beyond these trivial points. The fact a given phenomenon is not supernatural appears incidentally from studying what it is. Undertaking a study with the agenda of proving something is not supernatural is not something neurological researchers do. Anything generated by strong confirmation bias like that would naturally be suspect. Their agenda, rather, is simply to find out what it is, what neurological mechanism underlies the experience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92


I don't see the point in discussing this since this entire forum will disappear after tomorrow.
 
  • #93
Evo said:
I don't see the point in discussing this since this entire forum will disappear after tomorrow.

Sorry for being off-topic, but ongoing discussions in S&D will be continued in GD right? Or will they be locked away?
 
  • #94


zoobyshoe said:
Strawman.

Ambiguous.

Neurology is already way beyond these trivial points. The fact a given phenomenon is not supernatural appears incidentally from studying what it is. Undertaking a study with the agenda of proving something is not supernatural is not something neurological researchers do. Anything generated by strong confirmation bias like that would naturally be suspect. Their agenda, rather, is simply to find out what it is, what neurological mechanism underlies the experience.

I don't see how that differs from what I was saying. *I* was the one who suggested that, TO ME, the more one studies it, the more that I find the claim of anything supernatural to be even less convincing. That has been the pattern we have seen so far! I certainly hate to put my thought into what neuro-scientists were thinking.

Zz.
 
  • #95


surajt88 said:
Sorry for being off-topic, but ongoing discussions in S&D will be continued in GD right? Or will they be locked away?
ALL S&D threads will be locked. The new forum is due to open tomorrow.
 
  • #96


Evo said:
ALL S&D threads will be locked. The new forum is due to open tomorrow.
1233_hand_clapping.gif
 
  • #97


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG6b3V2MNxQ
 
  • #98


Bye S&D!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K