Necessary axioms to derive solution to QHO problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Derive
Click For Summary
To solve the quantum harmonic oscillator using matrix methods, the Hamiltonian and the commutator relation are essential premises. An additional assumption is required: the Hamiltonian must have at least one eigenvector in the Hilbert space, indicating it is essentially self-adjoint. Furthermore, all three matrices involved—position, momentum, and Hamiltonian—must be Hermitian, which adds another layer of restriction. These conditions are crucial for deriving solutions without resorting to the Schrödinger equation. The discussion highlights the importance of these axioms in the context of quantum mechanics.
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I'm wondering how one solves for the quantum harmonic oscillator using matrix methods exclusively. Given the Hamiltonian
\hat{H} = \frac {1}{2m} \hat {P}^2 + \frac {1}{2} m \omega ^2 \hat {X}^2
and commutator relation
[ \hat {X} , \hat {P} ] = i \hbar \hat {I}
is that enough for premises? To me it looks like two equations and three unknowns. Are any other assumptions — either classical or quantum — allowed? It is tempting to introduce
\hat {H} \psi = E \psi
but that is called the Schrödinger equation after all, so it seems like cheating.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you need the extra assumption that the Hamiltonian has at least 1 eigenvector in the Hilbert space in which you represent the operator algebra. This amounts to saying the Hamiltonian is essentially self-adjoint on a representation space of the X,P,H operator algebra.
 
Very interesting, thank you dextercioby.

edit: Oh wait, all three matrices have to be Hermitian, don't they? That's a restriction, too.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K