Need help solving a differential equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a complex differential equation of the form $$ A\frac{d^2f(x)}{dx^2}+B\frac{df(x)}{dx}+Ce^{igx}f(x) = 0 $$ Participants explore various methods for finding analytical solutions, including exponential functions, Laplace transforms, and Fourier transforms, while addressing the complexities introduced by the term involving \(e^{igx}\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about known analytical methods for solving the given differential equation.
  • Another participant proposes a solution of the form \(f_{(x)}=e^{a+bx}\) and suggests finding complex constants \(a\) and \(b\).
  • Several participants express confusion about the proposed solution, questioning its derivation and applicability given the specific form of the equation.
  • It is noted that the presence of the term \(e^{igx}\) complicates the solution, distinguishing it from simpler differential equations.
  • One participant suggests using Laplace or Fourier transforms to simplify the problem, although they express uncertainty about the applicability of these methods to homogeneous equations.
  • Another participant elaborates on the Fourier transform approach, raising concerns about obtaining a non-trivial solution and the challenges posed by the equation in the Fourier domain.
  • A later reply acknowledges the complexity of the problem and presents a more intricate solution involving the Gamma function and Bessel functions, while also requesting clarification on the steps taken to reach that solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the differential equation, with multiple competing views on the applicability of various techniques and the nature of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the specific challenges posed by the term \(e^{igx}\) and the implications for the methods discussed, indicating that the equation's complexity may require more advanced techniques than those typically taught in basic courses.

maNoFchangE
Messages
115
Reaction score
4
Are there any known analytical method to solve the equation
$$
A\frac{d^2f(x)}{dx^2}+B\frac{df(x)}{dx}+Ce^{igx}f(x) = 0\hspace{1cm}?
$$
All quantities appearing in that equation are complex except for ##g## and ##x##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution is f_{(x)}=e^{a+bx}. You need to find the complex constants a and b.
 
Thanks, but how do you come up with that solution? Have you ever found the above equation somewhere else and the solution is given like that?
 
maNoFchangE said:
Thanks, but how do you come up with that solution? Have you ever found the above equation somewhere else and the solution is given like that?

It is a trivial solution taught at any basic course of differential equations. If you have a differential equation written as \sum_{n=0} ^m c_n \frac{\mathrm{d} ^n f_{(x)}}{\mathrm{d} x^n}=0, then is is known that the solution is an exponential function.
 
depizixuri said:
It is a trivial solution taught at any basic course of differential equations. If you have a differential equation written as \sum_{n=0} ^m c_n \frac{\mathrm{d} ^n f_{(x)}}{\mathrm{d} x^n}=0, then is is known that the solution is an exponential function.
Please take a look again at the original equation, it is different from the one you suggest due to the presence of ##e^{igx}## in the third term.
 
There are many ways to solve it without previous knowledge of the solution. One is to make a Laplace or Fourier transform. It turns the problem into a very simple equation without any derivatives. You solve it, and reverse the transform.
 
maNoFchangE said:
Please take a look again at the original equation, it is different from the one you suggest due to the presence of ##e^{igx}## in the third term.
The exponential is easy to deal because exponents are added on multiplication.
 
depizixuri said:
One is to make a Laplace or Fourier transform.
I know what you mean there, but do those methods work for homogenous equation? For the moment just remove ##e^{igx}## from the third term, and then perform Fourier transform on each term. I will then get
$$
Ak^2F(k) + iBkF(k) + CF(k) = 0
$$
where ##F(k)## is the Fourier transform of ##f(x)##. How will you solve for a non-trivial solution of ##F(k)## in the above equation since the right hand side is zero? Even when ##e^{igx}## is retained, the equation in Fourier domain becomes
$$
Ak^2F(k) + iBkF(k) + CF(k-g) = 0
$$
I don't see how I can get an explicit expression for ##F(k)## in this case.
 
maNoFchangE said:
I know what you mean there, but do those methods work for homogenous equation? For the moment just remove ##e^{igx}## from the third term, and then perform Fourier transform on each term. I will then get
$$
Ak^2F(k) + iBkF(k) + CF(k) = 0
$$
where ##F(k)## is the Fourier transform of ##f(x)##. How will you solve for a non-trivial solution of ##F(k)## in the above equation since the right hand side is zero? Even when ##e^{igx}## is retained, the equation in Fourier domain becomes
$$
Ak^2F(k) + iBkF(k) + CF(k-g) = 0
$$
I don't see how I can get an explicit expression for ##F(k)## in this case.

Sorry, you are right. Is not trivial. I was wrong.

Is better to use Laplace transform, and even then you get a nasty work.

Your solution is

$$
f(x) = \left ( c_1 \Gamma_{\left(\frac{B}{A g i}+1\right)} J_{\left({\frac{B}{A g i}} , \frac{2 \sqrt{A C e^{g i x}}}{A g i}\right)}+c_2 \Gamma_{\left(1-\frac{B}{A g i}\right)} J_{\left({-\frac{B}{A g i}} , \frac{2 \sqrt{A C e^{g i x}}}{A g i}\right)} \right) e^{-\frac{B x}{2 A}}
$$

.. where \Gamma is the Gamma function, J_{(\alpha,x)} is the Bessel function; c_1 and c_2 are constants to adjust to your initial conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: maNoFchangE
  • #10
Thank you very much, I really appreciate your effort to help me. Just, can you please point out the steps you took to reach that solution?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K