How to Identify an Airfoil from a Piece-wise Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsCU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airfoil
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying airfoils represented by piece-wise functions, particularly using the NACA 4-digit convention. Participants clarify that for a NACA 2412 airfoil, the maximum camber is located at 24% of the chord length, while a NACA 0016 airfoil is symmetric with a maximum thickness of 16% of the chord. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these conventions to match airfoils to their respective functions accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piece-wise functions in calculus
  • Familiarity with NACA airfoil naming conventions
  • Basic knowledge of aerodynamics principles
  • Ability to analyze airfoil characteristics such as camber and thickness
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the NACA 4-digit airfoil classification system
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of airfoils using piece-wise functions
  • Explore other airfoil naming conventions beyond NACA
  • Study the impact of camber and thickness on airfoil performance
USEFUL FOR

Aerodynamics students, engineers working with airfoil design, and anyone involved in computational fluid dynamics or aerodynamic analysis will benefit from this discussion.

physicsCU
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
OK, I have two labs, one in Calc 3, one in aerodynamics.

In calc 3, we are using an airfoil described by a piece-wise function. How can I figure out what the name of that airfoil is?

By that, I mean can I match up the airfoil to the function given?

Or will I have to work backwards and choose a known airfoil?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
if you are using the standard NACA 4 digit convention then it works as follows.

For a NACA 2412, the maximum camber occurs at 24% down the chord from the leading edge, and the maximum thickness of the airfoil is 12% of the total chord length.

For a NACA 0016. the airfoil has no camber (thus is symmetric) and has a maximum thickness of 16% of the total chord lenght.

There are other naming conventions as well and the values are typically expressed in terms of % chord
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K