Negative Exponent Explained: 300 cm-1 Meaning

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent Negative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the meaning of negative exponents in scientific notation, specifically focusing on the term "300 cm-1". This notation represents the wavenumber, which is the reciprocal of the wavelength measured in centimeters. The higher the wavenumber, the greater the energy associated with the vibrational modes of molecules. The conversation also references the significance of wavenumbers in quantum physics, particularly in understanding energy level schemes in diatomic molecules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scientific notation and exponents
  • Familiarity with the concept of wavenumbers in physics
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and molecular vibrations
  • Ability to interpret energy level diagrams in diatomic molecules
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of wavenumbers and their applications in spectroscopy
  • Learn about the relationship between wavenumbers and molecular energy levels
  • Explore the principles of quantum mechanics related to vibrational and rotational motions
  • Study the significance of wavelength and frequency in electromagnetic radiation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, chemistry, and materials science, particularly those interested in molecular spectroscopy and quantum mechanics.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,198
Reaction score
7,677
I've seen the use of a negative exponent in the books and articles I've been reading lately, and I was wondering exactly what it meant. Such as 300 cm-1, where cm has a -1 as the exponent. (Dont know how to type that out.) What does it mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It means the same thing as \frac{1}{cm}. For instance, 3m s^{-1} means the same thing as 3\frac{m}{s}
 
Hrmm. I just read something where the distance between two atoms was 3000 cm-1. Surely that can't be 3000 over 1?
 
That can't be right for a distance. Can you give the exact sentence?
 
Sure, here it is.

"Since both rotational and vibrational motions are simultaneously occurring in the diatomic, the energy level scheme for two adjacent vibration levels (spaced, say, 3000 cm-1 apart) where ca. 10 cm-1 in the two states, would be as shown in Fig. 1."

From the article here: http://www.chem.ufl.edu/~itl/4411L_f00/hcl/hcl_il.html

Edit: Copy and Pasting didn't keep the exponents like they were in the article, as they now look like I typed it out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, it's not a measurement of the physical distance between atoms, it's a measure of the difference in frequency between the radiation emitted by two modes of vibration of the pair of atoms. This measurement is called the "wavenumber":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavenumber
The higher the wavenumber, the higher the energy of the vibration.
 
Ah, ok. That makes perfect sense now. I've been reading some things on quantum physics and such, and I had never seen that before. Thanks!
 
Drakkith said:
Sure, here it is.

"Since both rotational and vibrational motions are simultaneously occurring in the diatomic, the energy level scheme for two adjacent vibration levels (spaced, say, 3000 cm-1 apart) where ca. 10 cm-1 in the two states, would be as shown in Fig. 1."

From the article here: http://www.chem.ufl.edu/~itl/4411L_f00/hcl/hcl_il.html

Edit: Copy and Pasting didn't keep the exponents like they were in the article, as they now look like I typed it out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavenumber

It's used for the wavenumber, which is proportional to the reciprocal of the wavelength (which is measured in cm). Why wavenumbers are important isn't a question I could answer. I forgot a lot of physics. =(

Euler beat me!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gb7nash said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavenumber

It's used for the wavenumber, which is proportional to the reciprocal of the wavelength (which is measured in cm). Why wavenumbers are important isn't a question I could answer. I forgot a lot of physics. =(

Euler beat me!

Thanks to you too nash. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K