Neither the player nor the dealer is dealt a blackjack

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_wiz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability that neither the player nor the dealer is dealt a blackjack in a game of blackjack using a freshly shuffled deck. Participants explore various probabilistic approaches and calculations related to this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation for the probability of at least one blackjack and notes a discrepancy with the expected answer, suggesting a probability of about one percent higher than the correct value.
  • Another participant introduces conditional probability to express the probability of neither the player nor the dealer getting a blackjack, but acknowledges a flaw in their reasoning regarding the first player's potential to receive an ace without achieving a blackjack.
  • A third participant references a solution from actuaries, detailing a formula involving the probabilities of individual events and their intersection, leading to a derived probability of no blackjack being approximately 0.9052.
  • One participant expresses interest in the problem by mentioning they posted it on another forum, indicating a desire for confirmation or additional insights.
  • Another participant expands the discussion by considering the case of three players and presents a similar probability calculation for that scenario, arriving at a different probability for at least one blackjack among three players.
  • A later reply reiterates the initial problem setup and introduces notation for the probabilities of individual players getting a blackjack, suggesting a formulaic approach to derive the overall probability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct method or final probability. Multiple competing views and calculations are presented, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on assumptions about independence and the specific definitions of events, which are not fully resolved in the discussion. There are also references to different methods that yield varying results, highlighting the complexity of the problem.

Physics_wiz
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the probability of neither the player nor the dealer being dealt a blackjack (an ace with a ten, jack, queen, or king) in a blackjack game with a freshly shuffled deck. This is what I did:

1 - P(at least one gets a blackjack)

= 1 - [ 4*16/(52c2) + 3*15/(50c2)]

However, I get an answer that's about one percent higher than it should be. The right answer is .9052.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to conditional probability, we have P(~A and ~B) =P(~A)xP(~B|~A) Which I read, the probability of not A and not B is equal to the probability of not A times the probability of not B given not A)

So in this case, we have not A = (1-(4*16/52C2) and not B given not A =1-64/50C2.

If that is correct, then we have (.9478)(.9517) = .9020.

HOWEVER, I see that this reasoning has a flaw in it, because it does not take into account that the first player may get, for example, an ace, but not have a blackjack.
 
Last edited:
It turns out this problem has been solved by a group of actuaries. http://actuary.com/actuarial-discussion-forum/showthread.php?t=5022

The solution is: P(AUB)=P(A)+P(B)-P(AB).

In this case, P(A)=P(B), because both cases are independent and they both have equal odds. However, P(AB) = 4x16/52C2 * 3x15/50C2. Thus the probability of at least one blackjack is .0947579032. And the probability of no blackjack is .905242097.

If this seems strange, a simpler example is: If two cards are dealt, what is the probability that at least one is red?

P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B) -P(AB) = 1/2 + 1/2 -(26/52)(25/51) =.75490.

This can be checked by looking at tree probability:

1/2R to 25/51 R or 26/51 B

And 1/2B to 26/51R or 25/51B.

Thus if both are black we have (1/2)(25/51) =25/(102) = .24510; and at least one is red = 1-.24510= .75490.
 
Yep, I posted the problem over there too...I was anxious to know the answer. I was going to post the solution here but forgot, thanks robert.
 
We could look at this in the case of three players. First we consider just three cards and being dealt. Consider the color red:

P(aUbUc) = P(a)+P(b)+P(c) - {P(ab)+P(ac) + P(bc)} + P(abc). (P(ab) means P(a intersection b)).

But the probabilities in each group are the same, so this becomes:

P(aUbUc) = 3P(a)-3P(ab)+P(abc)

The P(a) = 1/2; P(ab)=(1/2)(25/51)=25/102; P(abc) = (1/2)(25/51)(24/50) =2/17.
Thus P(aUbUc) = 3/2-75/102 + 2/17 = 15/17. While if all three cards are black, we independently find: (1/2)(25/51)(24/50) = 2/17.

Applying the same method to the blackjack problem, we arrive at: The probability that at least one hand of three will have a blackjack is .139521.., and thus chance of no blackjack is approximately 86%.
 
Last edited:
Physics_wiz said:
I am trying to find the probability of neither the player nor the dealer being dealt a blackjack (an ace with a ten, jack, queen, or king) in a blackjack game with a freshly shuffled deck. This is what I did:

Let ; p(a1) be the probability that only the player gets the black jack
p(a2) be the probability that only the dealer gets the black jack
p(a1Ua2) will be the probability both gets the black jack

we know p(a1Ua2) = p(a1)+ p(a2)-p(a1a2) ------- Eq(1)
and p(a1Ua2)^c = 1- p(a1Ua2)
= 1- p(a1)+ p(a2)-p(a1a2) --- Eq(2)


p(a1) = ((4choose1)*(16choose1))/(52 choose2)
p(a2) = ((4choose1)*(16choose1))/(50 choose2)
p(a1Ua2) = {((4choose1)*(16choose1))/(52 choose2)}*{((3choose1)*(15choose1))/(50 choose2)}
rest is algebra...
gppd luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K