APS to Change Name: Share Your Suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gokul43201
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proposed name change of the American Physical Society (APS) to the American Physics Society. Participants explore the implications of this change for public perception and representation of the organization, as well as share their opinions on whether the change should occur and what alternatives might be suggested.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants support the name change, arguing it would clarify the organization's purpose to the public and enhance its representation.
  • Others oppose the change, questioning its necessity and suggesting that the existing name is already well-known.
  • A participant humorously notes that even with the current name, people often confuse physicists with medical doctors.
  • Concerns are raised about the visibility of the APS name during conferences and how it affects public recognition.
  • Some participants share anecdotes about being mistaken for physicians or psychics, highlighting the ongoing confusion surrounding the name.
  • There is a mention of the logistical challenges of hosting large conferences in smaller cities, which may impact public awareness of the APS.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of support and opposition to the proposed name change, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on whether the name should be changed or what the best alternative might be.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the historical significance of the APS name and the potential impact of the name change on public perception, but do not resolve the implications of these factors.

Should the APS change its name ?

  • No, "American Physical Society" is just fine.

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • Yes, make it the "American Physics Society"

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • Yes, to something else

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I'm not sure/I don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't care

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,207
Reaction score
25
From an email to APS members

"At its June meeting, the APS Executive Board strongly endorsed changing
the public name used by APS from American Physical Society to American
Physics Society. The reason is simple: the word "physical" means
several things to the general public, most often not physics. This
causes confusion and uncertainty regarding what kind of organization
APS is, and dilutes the impact APS can have in representing the physics
community to the media, the government, and the public at large. "

"The Board is mindful of the 106-year history of the American
Physical Society, and would continue to use this name for internal
purposes, such as our journals and prizes."

Do you think the APS should make a change ? If yes, what alternative do you suggest ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I voted already at their website agreeing to the name change. It makes it clearer, at least to the public, on what the organization represents.

Besides, that name change doesn't require a change in the acronym. So they don't have to reorder all new towels. :)

Zz.
 
I voted for the first option. I see no reason to change it. And if they eventually do it, who'll notice ?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
And if they eventually do it, who'll notice ?
When there's an APS March/April meeting happening somewhere (especially if its not in a large metro, like LA or Seattle) a lot of people in the area actually get to hear the name "APS" and many will see hordes of people walking down the streets (to or from the conference) with APS nametags and what-nots. Nearby shop and restaurant owners will be seeing hundreds of physicists for perhaps the first time in their lives.

We can't have all these people thinking were doctors, can we ? :wink:
 
Gokul43201 said:
When there's an APS March/April meeting happening somewhere (especially if its not in a large metro, like LA or Seattle)

I don't think that's possible, Gokul! :)

Well, at least not for the March Meetings, which typically get 5000+ attendees. Those usually are planned several years in advance and can only be located in cities with large conference area, so those tend to be large cities too. I was at the 1999 APS Centenial March Meeting in Atlanta, and it was a ZOO! (No, the conference was a zoo, not the location) :)

In any case, we are often called "physicians" anyway by many people. So we are already being confused as medical doctors with or without the APS logo. :)

Zz.
 
Oh, I consider Indianapolis a tiny village ! Any dissenters ?
 
Gokul43201 said:
Oh, I consider Indianapolis a tiny village ! Any dissenters ?

Hahaha... you have a point there. For a city that size, they sure have a very large convention center. They were very happy to have us there a few years ago - the downtown shopping mall had the APS sign all over the place.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
In any case, we are often called "physicians" anyway by many people.
Not to say anything about "psychics" ! :eek:
 
Even this year, in LA, a waiter at a restaurant asked me "if I was there for the conference" and something like "what's this big conference all about anyway" ?

Then he wanted to know what some of the interesting things that have just been discovered were. Luckily for me, one of the big things this year was Chan's paper on supersolid He4...which is something that can be discussed in lay terms and will evoke a response of interest from a non-physicist. Try explaining why MgB2 is a big deal ! :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K