New Nature Paper: Old Ia Supernovae different?

AI Thread Summary
A recent paper suggests the discovery of a super-Chandrasekhar Ia supernova, indicating that these events may predominantly occur in young stellar populations. This finding could significantly impact cosmological models, as these new supernovae are reportedly twice as bright as previously understood, necessitating a reevaluation of distances derived from Type Ia supernovae. The traditional explanation of a white dwarf gaining mass from a companion red giant does not account for this new type, leading to hypotheses such as collisions between two white dwarfs or the influence of high angular velocity in a single white dwarf. Spectroscopic identification of these supernovae will allow for further data collection and analysis. Overall, this discovery opens new avenues for understanding supernova mechanisms and their implications for cosmology.
George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,643
Reaction score
1,601
A http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609616" claims that a super-Chandrasekhar Ia supernova has been found, and that "Super-Chandrasekhar mass SNe Ia should preferentially occur in a young stellar population."

This, obviously, could have implications for cosmology. These "new" supernovae can be identified spectroscopically, so such supernovae data can be checked for this new type.

My guess is that isn't going to be enough to make a cosmological constant/dark energy go away.

Edit: I meant to start this thread in the Astrophysics Forum, but I guees it's OK here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Apparently new type Ia are two times brighter than previously thought so cosmological distances that are based on typeIa novae may need to be reevaluated.
 
This new SNIa is unsual and cannot be explained by the normal mechanism, i.e. white dwarf accreting from a companion red giant. One possible explanation for this case is two white dwarfs colliding.
 
another explanation that i read was that the white dwarf could have had considerable angular velocity.
 
mathman said:
One possible explanation for this case is two white dwarfs colliding.

sdemjanenko said:
another explanation that i read was that the white dwarf could have had considerable angular velocity.

Yesterday I heard an http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/media/2006-2007/mp3/qq-2006-09-23b.mp3" with one of the authors, and he mentioned both effects.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top