ion88 said:
Sory but I don't even know what programming language is that
Hi ion88, welcome to MHB! (Wave)
No worries.
I believe you've already correctly filled in the table, which is what MarkFL uploaded for you.
I'm afraid it also means that the conjunctive normal form that you had found (¬B ∨ C), is not correct.
We can verify by checking (¬B ∨ C) against your truth table, and see that it does not match. (Worried)
The easiest way to convert your truth table to conjunctive form, is through a so called
Karnaugh Map.
It looks like this:
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{karnaugh-map}
\node {
\begin{karnaugh-map}[4][2][1][AB][C]
\minterms{0,1,2,3,7}
\maxterms{4,5,6}
\implicant{0}{2}
\implicant{3}{7}
\end{karnaugh-map}
};
\end{tikzpicture}
From this Karnaugh Map, we can deduce that the corresponding
disjunctive expression is:
(A & B) ∨ ¬C
That is, the green rectangle corresponds to (A & B), and the red rectangle corresponds to ¬C.
The resulting expression is true if we are in the green rectangle OR in the red rectangle.
We can convert it to conjunctive normal form by using the distributivity of boolean expressions:
(A & B) ∨ ¬C = (A ∨ ¬C) & (B ∨ ¬C)
(Thinking)