MHB Newbie Needs Help with CNF of Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter ion88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
ion88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello I'm new here. Can someone please help me with the conjunctive normal form for this formula ?
(((A -> (B -> C)) & (A -> B)) & A) <-> C
I don't know if i did this right or not. If not what should i do ?
oT5LC58
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • mhb_inline_0001.png
    mhb_inline_0001.png
    85.4 KB · Views: 97
ion88 said:
Hello I'm new here. Can someone please help me with the conjunctive normal form for this formula ?
(((A -> (B -> C)) & (A -> B)) & A) <-> C
I don't know if i did this right or not. If not what should i do ?
Hello ion88.

This is the truth table you need to fill in:

$$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline A & B & C & B\to C & A\to(B\to C) & A\to B & (A\to(B\to C))\,\&\,(A\to B) & ((A\to(B\to C))\,\&\,(A\to B))\,\&\,A \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 1 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

When you have done, compare the last column with the $C$ column.
 
Olinguito said:
Hello ion88.

This is the truth table you need to fill in:

$$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline A & B & C & B\to C & A\to(B\to C) & A\to B & (A\to(B\to C))\,\&\,(A\to B) & ((A\to(B\to C))\,\&\,(A\to B))\,\&\,A \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 1 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

When you have done, compare the last column with the $C$ column.


Sory but I don't even know what programming language is that
 
ion88 said:
Sory but I don't even know what programming language is that

Hi ion88, welcome to MHB! (Wave)

No worries.
I believe you've already correctly filled in the table, which is what MarkFL uploaded for you.

I'm afraid it also means that the conjunctive normal form that you had found (¬B ∨ C), is not correct.
We can verify by checking (¬B ∨ C) against your truth table, and see that it does not match. (Worried)

The easiest way to convert your truth table to conjunctive form, is through a so called Karnaugh Map.
It looks like this:
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{karnaugh-map}
\node {
\begin{karnaugh-map}[4][2][1][AB][C]
\minterms{0,1,2,3,7}
\maxterms{4,5,6}
\implicant{0}{2}
\implicant{3}{7}
\end{karnaugh-map}
};
\end{tikzpicture}
From this Karnaugh Map, we can deduce that the corresponding disjunctive expression is:
(A & B) ∨ ¬C​
That is, the green rectangle corresponds to (A & B), and the red rectangle corresponds to ¬C.
The resulting expression is true if we are in the green rectangle OR in the red rectangle.

We can convert it to conjunctive normal form by using the distributivity of boolean expressions:
(A & B) ∨ ¬C = (A ∨ ¬C) & (B ∨ ¬C)​
(Thinking)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top