Newton-Raphson Iteration in Transient Thermal Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Newton-Raphson iterations in transient thermal analysis using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) with implicit schemes, specifically the Crank-Nicolson method. Shriram expresses confusion regarding the necessity of these iterations based on the residual vector at each time-step. Matt clarifies that the Crank-Nicolson method is a finite difference method, not applicable to FEA, suggesting that users should consult their FEA program's help manual for further guidance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transient thermal analysis
  • Familiarity with Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
  • Knowledge of implicit schemes in numerical methods
  • Basic principles of the Crank-Nicolson method
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between finite difference methods and finite element methods
  • Explore the implementation of Newton-Raphson iterations in numerical analysis
  • Study the Crank-Nicolson method in detail for transient heat conduction problems
  • Consult FEA software documentation for specific iterative methods used
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers involved in thermal analysis, numerical method practitioners, and anyone utilizing FEA software for transient thermal simulations.

Shriram
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have been quite confused about this for sometime now. It has not been mentioned clearly in the books/references that I have looked into.

In transient thermal analysis using FEA with implicit scheme or the Crank Nicolson scheme, are there Newton Raphson iterations based on the residual vector in every time-step?

Any insights or suggestions are highly appreciated.


Thanks,
Shriram
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Crank-Nicolson is a finite difference method, not a finite element method.

Have you checked your FEA programs help manual?

Thanks
Matt
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K