MHB Next set of prime birthdays for three brothers

  • Thread starter Thread starter fernlund
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Set
fernlund
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello! I have the following problem:

Three brothers are aged 6, 10 and 14 years old. Will they ever, in the future, have a prime number birthday the same year? Looking at all of the prime numbers between 1 and 100, it seems that they won't.

So I guess this is the same thing as saying: are there three consecutive prime numbers with a gap of four between the first and the second pair? Is there any way of proving this, or disproving this? Where do I start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, to be safe, let's assume none of the brothers lives beyond 130. The primes less than 130 are
2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127. Just run through them. Does the pattern you mention show up here?
 
fernlund said:
Hello! I have the following problem:

Three brothers are aged 6, 10 and 14 years old. Will they ever, in the future, have a prime number birthday the same year? Looking at all of the prime numbers between 1 and 100, it seems that they won't.

So I guess this is the same thing as saying: are there three consecutive prime numbers with a gap of four between the first and the second pair? Is there any way of proving this, or disproving this? Where do I start?

Hi fernlund,

This is a very interesting question. This is equivalent to asking whether in the Prime Gap sequence 4 occurs twice consecutively. I didn't find anything about the consecutive occurrences of numbers of the prime gap sequence so I suspect this might be a open problem.
 
Forget 100 years . There is no solution
the ages are x , x+4, x+8 and working mod 3 we have 0,1,2 not necessarily in order so one of them is divisible by 3. only solution is 3,7,11 that was 3 years before and not after
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top