No 2 electrons can have the same energy state

In summary, Professor Brian Cox said that no two electrons can have the same energy state. This is correct. Furthermore, he said that this applies to the universe and every time an electron in an atom jumps to a new energy state, actually he just said has more energy, then every electron in the universe has to adjust its energy state, instantly.
  • #1
boffinwannabe
53
0
i was watching the Brian Cox 'night with the stars'. He said that no 2 electrons can have the same energy state. Is this correct? i thought they couldn't have the same quantum numbers but can even share the same orbital (thus same energy). I also thought this applied to the same atom only, but he stated it applies to the universe and every time an electron in an atom jumps to a new energy state, actually he just said has more energy, then every electron in the universe has to adjust its energy state, instantly. Can someone put some detail on this as i haven't come across this before. The only understanding i have of particles seemingly being able to communicate instantly no matter how far apart they are is in entanglement, but he didnt seem to be suggesting this was the mechanism.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No two electrons can occupy the same state, although they are perfectly happy to occupy different states with the same energy.
and every time an electron in an atom jumps to a new energy state, actually he just said has more energy, then every electron in the universe has to adjust its energy state, instantly.
I hope he didn't say that, because it's nonsense. In most cases, electron states are localized to a single atom [usually!] and if an electron in atom A becomes excited it has no effect at all on atom B. Certainly not to the atoms on Alpha Centauri.
 
  • #3
yes he stated every other electron across the universe has to switch its state to ensure no 2 electrons have the same energy state.
 
  • #4
boffinwannabe said:
yes he stated every other electron across the universe has to switch its state to ensure no 2 electrons have the same energy state.
That statement is wrong. First, the correct statement is "The (non-relativistic) many-body wave function of interacting electrons must be anti-symmetric." Only with a bunch of approximations (namely, a mean-field model of electronic interactions) this turns into "In a Slater determinant, no two electrons can occupy the same spin-orbital" (from which that "no same states"-statement originates). And *even then*, two electrons can still happily occupy different spin-orbitals with the same energy, as long as they differ in some other quantum number (e.g., spin, spatial symmetry, etc).

This is not merely a technicality. The "states" (one-particle states, also called "orbitals") this guy is speaking about simply don't exist. They are properties of approximations.
 
  • #5
Professor Cox had a gratuitous laugh at new-age mysticism. Then, later, he introduced what looked like instantaneous action at a distance without any explanation. Downright spooky. Could the universe somehow be represented by a single huge time-independent wave function? Was Prof. Cox talking about the holographic principle? Should he have mentioned entanglement (as has been suggested above)?
Prof. Cox did not explain it at all and I think it should therefore have been left out.
 
  • #6
boffinwannabe said:
i was watching the Brian Cox 'night with the stars'. He said that no 2 electrons can have the same energy state. Is this correct? i thought they couldn't have the same quantum numbers but can even share the same orbital (thus same energy). I also thought this applied to the same atom only, but he stated it applies to the universe and every time an electron in an atom jumps to a new energy state, actually he just said has more energy, then every electron in the universe has to adjust its energy state, instantly. Can someone put some detail on this as i haven't come across this before. The only understanding i have of particles seemingly being able to communicate instantly no matter how far apart they are is in entanglement, but he didnt seem to be suggesting this was the mechanism.

See also this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=561511 and reply from the man himself (becox).
 
  • #7
tx didnt see that one.
 

1. Why is it impossible for two electrons to have the same energy state?

The Pauli exclusion principle states that no two electrons can have the same quantum numbers, which includes energy state. This is due to the wave-like nature of electrons and how they occupy different orbitals within an atom.

2. How does this principle affect the behavior of electrons in an atom?

This principle dictates the arrangement of electrons in an atom's energy levels. It ensures that electrons are evenly distributed among the different energy states, allowing for greater stability and minimizing repulsion between same-charged particles.

3. Can this principle be applied to other particles besides electrons?

Yes, the Pauli exclusion principle can be applied to other particles with half-integer spin, such as protons, neutrons, and quarks. It also extends to other fermions, which are particles that follow the rules of quantum mechanics.

4. Are there any exceptions to this principle?

There are a few exceptions to this principle, such as in the case of degenerate energy levels, where two electrons can have the same energy state if they have opposite spins. Additionally, in highly excited states or in extreme conditions, the principle may not hold true.

5. How does this principle relate to the electron configuration of an atom?

The electron configuration of an atom follows the Pauli exclusion principle, as it determines the arrangement of electrons in an atom's energy levels. It helps to explain the observed properties of elements and their chemical behavior.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
635
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
355
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
4
Replies
124
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top