No infinite gravitation in string theory?

Click For Summary
String theory addresses the issue of infinite gravitation that arises in quantum mechanics combined with general relativity by avoiding infinities through its topological constraints on the string world sheet. The traditional perturbation series used in quantum field theory leads to infinite terms, which cannot be renormalized in perturbatively quantized general relativity. While no proof exists that these infinities will not appear at all orders, the string theory community is optimistic about its non-perturbative nature preventing such issues. Additionally, string theory predicts the existence of a massless spin-2 particle that aligns with the characteristics of a graviton. Overall, string theory offers a promising framework for resolving gravitational infinities while supporting the graviton's existence.
Eolill
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Combining quantum mechanics with general relativity supposedly yields infinite gravitation, between the gravitons if I have understood this correctly (correct me if I'm wrong). String theory supposedly does away with this infinite gravitation -- my question is, how does it do this? Furthermore, does string theory actually predict the existence of a graviton?

Thank you. ^^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The infinities arise as a consequence of a certain mathematical tool, the perturbation series. It's like a Taylor expansion of a scattering amplitude; the small parameter is the coupling constant (Newton's constant).

Due to some properties of GR one can show that the individual terms in this series become infinite. That's uggly, but not the core of the problem. These infinities are wel-known from QFT, but there they can be removed via renormalization. One can show that this FAILS in perturbatively quantized GR.

In s.t. one expects that due to the topologically constraints for the string world sheet those infinities do not show up. As far as I know no proof to all orders exist but the s.t. community agrees that it will show up eventually.

What I don't expect is that the perturbation series as a whole (the sum) is finite. I would say that this is not due to a failure in the fundamental theory but due to the perturbation expansion. This tool is overestimated because of its successes in particle physics. In a fundamental theory with non-perturbative treatment no infinities should arise; this should be true in s.t. and it is true in other QG approaches.
 
to answer your second question, yes one of string theory's main appeals is that it predicts the existence of a massless spin-2 particle consistent with the graviton
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K