Non-leptonic hadron decays: preferred paths?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter terra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decay hadron
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interactions involved in non-leptonic hadron decays, specifically focusing on the preferred interaction pathways. It is established that weak interactions are necessary when the flavor of quarks changes, while strong, weak, or electromagnetic interactions can occur when flavors remain unchanged. The strong interaction typically dominates due to its strength, with the electromagnetic interaction being significantly weaker and the weak interaction often negligible unless other options are unavailable. The QCD energy scale is crucial for understanding binding energies in hadrons, as it influences the coupling constants and the applicability of perturbation theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics fundamentals
  • Knowledge of quark flavor changes and interactions
  • Familiarity with Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Basic concepts of coupling constants in particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) in hadron binding energies
  • Study the differences between strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions
  • Explore the concept of coupling constants and their dependence on energy scales
  • Investigate rare decay processes, such as those involving the J/Psi particle
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in hadron decay processes and the interactions governing them.

terra
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
My background of some introductory courses in particle physics has left me with severe shortcomings.

Say we start from a hadron, which decays purely to other hadrons. My question is this: through which interaction does the process take place? Is there a preferred interaction, and why/why not?
Let me put my thoughts/guesses/current understanding here.
A process in which the flavour of one or more quarks in the original hadron changes, must happen through weak interaction, and there are no other options.
Processes in which the flavours don't change could happen either through strong, weak or electromagnetic interaction. Right? Now, my guess is that there is a preference. How should I see this exactly? I thought about comparing the coupling constants, but I've understood that the coupling constant of the strong force depends on the distance of the quarks. Then again, how far can I get the quarks from each other depends on the energy they have. So once I fix the energy scale, I would be able to compare the couplings? Or is there an easier approach? Or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
terra said:
Processes in which the flavours don't change could happen either through strong, weak or electromagnetic interaction. Right?
Right.

terra said:
I thought about comparing the coupling constants, but I've understood that the coupling constant of the strong force depends on the distance of the quarks.
It depends on energy, but binding energies in hadrons are always at the QCD energy scale. "Distance of quarks" is not a meaningful concept in hadrons.
The strong interaction is so strong that it nearly always dominates.
The electromagnetic interaction is significantly weaker.
The weak interaction is negligible if one of the two other interactions is available.

Only in rare cases like the J/Psi the strong interactions gets suppressed enough to see electromagnetic decays.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terra
mfb said:
It depends on energy, but binding energies in hadrons are always at the QCD energy scale. "Distance of quarks" is not a meaningful concept in hadrons.
The strong interaction is so strong that it nearly always dominates.
The electromagnetic interaction is significantly weaker.
The weak interaction is negligible if one of the two other interactions is available.

Only in rare cases like the J/Psi the strong interactions gets suppressed enough to see electromagnetic decays.
I see, thank you for your insight. I take that by the qcd scale you mean the scale at which the coupling constant diverges, and as such perturbation theory can't be used.
 
Last edited:
There is a parameter called QCD scale, it is important for hadron binding energies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K