Normalisation of associated Laguerre polynomials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the normalization conditions for associated Laguerre polynomials, specifically comparing the integral form \(\int_0^\infty e^{-x}x^k L_n^k(x)L_m^k(x)dx=\frac{(n+k)!}{n!}\delta_{mn}\) with the normalization integral in the context of Schrödinger's equation in spherical coordinates, \(|N|^2\int_0^\infty (\alpha r)^l e^{-\alpha r}[L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1}(\alpha r)]^2 r^2 dr=1\). The user initially expressed confusion over the differing normalization forms but later resolved the issue independently. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the context in which these polynomials are applied.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with associated Laguerre polynomials
  • Understanding of normalization conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the generating function for associated Laguerre polynomials
  • Basic concepts of integrals in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the generating function of associated Laguerre polynomials
  • Study the application of associated Laguerre polynomials in quantum mechanics
  • Explore normalization techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Examine the role of spherical coordinates in Schrödinger's equation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics or mathematical physics, particularly those focusing on the properties and applications of associated Laguerre polynomials.

bdforbes
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I'm looking right now at what purports to be the normalisation condition for the associated Laguerre polynomials:

\int_0^\infty e^{-x}x^k L_n^k(x)L_m^k(x)dx=\frac{(n+k)!}{n!}\delta_{mn}

However, in the context of Schroedinger's equation in spherical coordinates, I find that my normalisation integral has a different form:

|N|^2\int_0^\infty (\alpha r)^l e^{-\alpha r}[L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1}(\alpha r)]^2 r^2 dr=1

I understand that I can evaluate this integral using the generating function of the associated Laguerre polynomials, but I'm a bit confused about why there are two forms for normalisation. Can anyone shed any light on this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey still need help on that?
 
No thanks I figured it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K