Polar Fourier transform of derivatives

hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,816
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
Computing Fourier transforms is simple in Cartesian co-ordinates but how do you do it for polar co-ordinates?
The 2D Fourier transform is given by: [tex]\hat{f}(k,l)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}f(x,y)e^{-ikx-ily}dxdy[/tex]
In terms of polar co-ordinates: [tex]\hat{f}(\rho,\phi)=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}rf(r,\theta)e^{-ir\rho\cos(\theta-\phi)}drd\theta[/tex]

For Fourier transforms in cartesian co-ordinates, relating the Fourier transform of a derivative of a function to the Fourier transform of the function. However, what happens with the polar Fourier transform? I've done a simple calculation for the [itex]r-[/itex]derivative and I get:
[tex]\widehat{\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}}=-\rho\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}\int_{0}^{\infty}rf_{n}(r)J_{n-1}(r\rho)dr[/tex]
This is after I expanded [itex]f(r,\theta)[/itex] as a Fourier series:[tex]f(r,\theta)=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}f_{n}(r)e^{in\theta}[/tex]
I feel a little lost at this point. Can anyone suggest anything?
 
hunt_mat said:
TL;DR Summary: Computing Fourier transforms is simple in Cartesian co-ordinates but how do you do it for polar co-ordinates?

The 2D Fourier transform is given by: [tex]\hat{f}(k,l)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}f(x,y)e^{-ikx-ily}dxdy[\tex][/tex]
[tex] Did you mean to type this? <br /> The 2D Fourier transform is given by: ##\hat{f}(k,l)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}f(x,y)e^{-ikx-ily}dxdy##[/tex]
 
DaveE said:
Did you mean to type this?
The 2D Fourier transform is given by: ##\hat{f}(k,l)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}f(x,y)e^{-ikx-ily}dxdy##
I was correcting my memory on how to include LaTeX here, you'll see that it's corrected now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
Search for "Hankel transform". The Wikipedia article doesn't give an expression for the transform of a derivative, but differentiating the inverse transform and using Bessel function identities should work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and hunt_mat
I had a feeling that this would be the case. A lot of my undergraduate was pure maths, mainly analysis and mathematical physics. Solving PDEs was something I had to teach myself about.

This is about a water wave problem, looking for the free surface from a vorticity distribution. The azimuthal component will be the most important.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K