Notation questions about kernel, cokernel, image and coimage

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elias001
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
elias001
Messages
390
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Notational questions on kernel, cokernel, coimage and image in some standard results in beginner level commutative algebra.
The screenshot pages below are taken from the book Advanced Algebra by: Anthony W Knapp, pp. 234-240 I also attached a pdf file of all the screenshots together.

I have notations related questions regarding the yellow hightlighted portions in each page in the below screenshots. I know they seem to be a lot, but i promise they are all related. I included page 1 and 7 for completion and for context continuity of the texts for all the seven pages.

Page 1

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-0.webp


Page 2

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-1.webp


Page 3

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-2.webp


Page 4

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-3.webp


Page 5

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-4.webp


Page 6

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-5.webp


Page 7

Anthony W. Knapp-Advanced Algebra (2016) pp 264- 270-images-6.webp



In each of the above screenshot pages, in the hightlighted portions are the notations where my questions are derived from.

For pages 2 and pages 3:

The brief form of the definition of kernel is that ##u\circ (\text{ker } u)=0## and ##ui'=0\text{ implies }i'=(\text{ker } u) \circ \varphi\text{ uniquely }##
and
The brief form of the definition of cokernel is that ##(\text{coker } u)\circ u =0## and ##p'u=0\text{ implies }p'=\psi\circ (\text{coker } u) \text{ uniquely }##
Also on on page 3 in Proposition 4.33 it states:
##\text{ker}(mu)text[ker ]u\text{ and }\text{coker}(ue)=\text{coker }u.##


Along with the following notations in the screenshot pages:

In the next page (page 4), in Proposition 4.35 it states:

##\text{ker(coker(ker u))}=\text{ker }u.##
##\text{coker(ker(coker )}u=\text{coker }u##

and on page 5 in Proposition 4.38 where it states:

##m=\text{ker(coker f)}##
and
##e=\text{coker(ker f)}##

Also in the proof of Proposition 4.38: where in the notation, it says:

##\text{(coker f)}f=0##
and
##f=me=m\text{(ker )}e'=m'e',\text{ where }m'=m\text{ ker }r##

In the last page, we also have the
##\text{coimage f}##


If I am given a homomorphism/mapping/linear transformation ##f## in the context of groups, commutative rings or modules, where ##f## maps from ##A## to ##B##. We can define the following:

##\text{ker }f=\{x\in A\mid f(x)=0\},##

##\text{im }f=\{f(x)\in B\mid x\in A\}=f(A),##

##\text{coim }f:=A/\text{ker }f,##

##\text{coker }f:=B/\text{im }f,##

along with ##\text{im }f\cong A/\text{ker }a=\text{coim }f##

Then I would often see the two following phrases:

The image of ##f## is the kernel of the cokernel of ##f \quad(*)##,

The coimage of ##f## is the cokernel of the kernel of ##f\quad(**)##

In math notations, it would be the same as the hightlighted notation on page 5

Also for ##(*)## in math notation, it would be ##\text{im }f=\text{ker(coker f)}## and for ##(**)##, in math notation, it would be ##\text{coim }f=\text{coker(ker f)}##

It is also well know that ##\text{im }f\cong A/\text{ker }f=\text{coim }f##

My questions are as follows:


1. How do I show ##\text{im }f=\text{ker(coker }f)=\text{ker }(B/\text{im }f)=f(A), \text{coim }f=\text{coker(ker }f)=\text{coker(B}/\text{im ker }f))=A/\text{ker }f?##


2. In page 6 screenshot, the notations: ##\text{(coker }f)f=0, m\text{(ker )}e', m\text{ ker }r##;
for ##\text{(coker }f)f##, does it mean ##\text{(coker }f)\circ f##, for ##m\text{(ker }r)e',## does it mean ##m\circ \text{(ker )}r\circ e'## and for ##m\text{ ker }r,## does it mean ##m\circ \text{ ker }r##? If not, then do the notation mean operationally, like, how do I multiply ##f## and ##\text{(coker }f)##, similarly, how does one multiply ##m,##, for ##m\text{(ker }r)e',## how do I multiply together ##m, \text{(ker }r), e'##, and siimilarly for ##m\text{ ker }r?##

Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
@martinbn sorry for my late reply, I just got up and saw your response. Let ##p## denote your map: ##p:B\to B/\text{im}(f)##, then we can define the kernel of ##p## as ##\text{ker }p=\{y\in B\mid p(y)=0+f(A)=f(A)\},## specificially, we want ##p(y)=y+f(A)=0+f(A)=f(A).##

By the way, I know kernel and cokernel of a map can be talked about respectively in terms of pull backs and push outs using basic category language. I also know that amongst the two concepts: coimage, cokernel. One of these two can't be discussed in either groups, rings or modules. I forgot which ones specifically. But for now, I am trying to stick to concrete contexts like commutative rings, groups or vector spaces, matrices and linear transformations.
 
@martinbn how is my answer show that the kernel of the cokernel is the image. Also, for my question 2. in my post, I still don't know what the notations: ##\text{(coker f)}f=0, m\text{(ker )}e', m\text{ ker }r## mean? Can you also explain that please? Is really confusing me. Thank you in advance.
 
@martinbn @fresh_42 After doing more research, here is what I am still confused about:

If we have a map ##f## that maps from ##A## to ##B## and ##f## is a homomorphism, then the definition of cokernel and coimage are respectively ##\frac{B}{\text{im }f},\frac{A}{\text{ker }f}##. We have the usual definition for kernel and image. Both ##\frac{B}{\text{im }f},\frac{A}{\text{ker }f}## are sets; and if we want to discuss properties of ##f## like surjectivity, injectivity, monomorphism, epimorphism using exact sequences, or in the context of additive category; why is it we can consider maps of the form ##p:B\to \frac{B}{\text{im }f}##, which is the cokernel of ##f##, and similarly ##k:\frac{A}{\text{ker }f}\to A## as the kernel of ##f##? We end up having exact sequence of the following form: ##\text{ker }f\xrightarrow{\text{ker }f} A\xrightarrow{f} B\xrightarrow{\text{coker }f} \text{coker }f,##, then one gets notation like ##f\circ\text{ker }f=0,## and ##\text{coker }f\circ f=0,## and also, ##\text{im }f=\text{coker }(\text{ker }f)=\text{coker }(\text{ker }f\to A)## and ##\text{coim }f=\text{ker }(\text{coker }f)=\text{ker }(B\to \text{coker }f).##

So when discussing cokernel, coimage of a map f, how does one know whether it is in terms of a map or a set?
 
elias001 said:
So when discussing cokernel, coimage of a map f, how does one know whether it is in terms of a map or a set?
From the context. The same way you know what A is. Is it a ring or a vertex of a triangle?
 
@martinbn Can you elaborate on that more, in the of examples of how you would write it in both circumstances. I just want to see examples of how it is stated properly for someone who knows these things better than myself.