I Notion of parallel worldlines in curved geometry

cianfa72
Messages
2,805
Reaction score
296
TL;DR Summary
About the notion "to be parallel" in the context of curved geometry
The notion of spacetime curvature is just the same as geodesic deviation. Therefore take for instance two bodies at different altitudes from Earth surface. In order to evaluate their geodesic deviation the two worldlines must start parallel in spacetime (actually in tangent spaces at both initial points/events).

We know in curved spacetime the notion of "to be parallel" is path dependent and it is given by the affine connection assigned to the spacetime as metric manifold (i.e. the Levi-Civita connection derivated from the metric tensor ##g## is normally used).

That said, which is the relevant/implied path to say that the two worldlines start parallel ? I believe it is the geodesic path one gets exponentiating the (spacelike) vector orthogonal to the first worldline's 4-velocity at its starting point that intersect the other worldline at its starting point.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cianfa72 said:
TL;DR Summary: About the notion "to be parallel" in the context of curved geometry

That said, which is the relevant/implied path to say that the two worldlines start parallel ?
Usually you can only make such a statement when those two worldlines are initially close enough that you can treat them as being in a flat spacetime. Then it is unambiguous.
 
  • Like
Likes robphy and cianfa72
Dale said:
Usually you can only make such a statement when those two worldlines are initially close enough that you can treat them as being in a flat spacetime. Then it is unambiguous.
Ok. Does the above definition of parallelism apply also to non geodesic worldlines as well?

Take for instance two concentric circles on the euclidean plane. From any point on the bigger one, draw the orthogonal straight line to the other circle getting a point.The tangents to circles on both points stay always parallel.
 
cianfa72 said:
Does the above definition of parallelism apply also to non geodesic worldlines as well?
I have never seen a definition of parallel that would apply to non-geodesics. There might be one, but I don't know of it.
 
Does the definition of "to be parallel" for geodesics also demand that the distance/lenght along the orthogonal geodesics between them at any point stays the same?

See also Clifford parallel.
 
Last edited:
I believe the definition of "to be parallel" for geodesics in the context of non-euclidean geometry actually doesn't demand that the (minimum) distance between them must stay constant.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top