I Notion of parallel worldlines in curved geometry

cianfa72
Messages
2,784
Reaction score
293
TL;DR Summary
About the notion "to be parallel" in the context of curved geometry
The notion of spacetime curvature is just the same as geodesic deviation. Therefore take for instance two bodies at different altitudes from Earth surface. In order to evaluate their geodesic deviation the two worldlines must start parallel in spacetime (actually in tangent spaces at both initial points/events).

We know in curved spacetime the notion of "to be parallel" is path dependent and it is given by the affine connection assigned to the spacetime as metric manifold (i.e. the Levi-Civita connection derivated from the metric tensor ##g## is normally used).

That said, which is the relevant/implied path to say that the two worldlines start parallel ? I believe it is the geodesic path one gets exponentiating the (spacelike) vector orthogonal to the first worldline's 4-velocity at its starting point that intersect the other worldline at its starting point.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cianfa72 said:
TL;DR Summary: About the notion "to be parallel" in the context of curved geometry

That said, which is the relevant/implied path to say that the two worldlines start parallel ?
Usually you can only make such a statement when those two worldlines are initially close enough that you can treat them as being in a flat spacetime. Then it is unambiguous.
 
  • Like
Likes robphy and cianfa72
Dale said:
Usually you can only make such a statement when those two worldlines are initially close enough that you can treat them as being in a flat spacetime. Then it is unambiguous.
Ok. Does the above definition of parallelism apply also to non geodesic worldlines as well?

Take for instance two concentric circles on the euclidean plane. From any point on the bigger one, draw the orthogonal straight line to the other circle getting a point.The tangents to circles on both points stay always parallel.
 
cianfa72 said:
Does the above definition of parallelism apply also to non geodesic worldlines as well?
I have never seen a definition of parallel that would apply to non-geodesics. There might be one, but I don't know of it.
 
Does the definition of "to be parallel" for geodesics also demand that the distance/lenght along the orthogonal geodesics between them at any point stays the same?

See also Clifford parallel.
 
Last edited:
I believe the definition of "to be parallel" for geodesics in the context of non-euclidean geometry actually doesn't demand that the (minimum) distance between them must stay constant.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top