NRC Reversing License Extensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter gmax137
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The federal government has reversed its previous decision to extend the Turkey Point nuclear power plant's operating license to 2052 and 2053, ordering a new environmental review. This decision by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) contradicts a 2019 ruling that accepted an outdated environmental impact statement from Florida Power & Light. Environmentalists now have an opportunity to raise concerns about climate change and flooding risks that were not adequately considered in the earlier extension. The NRC has reverted the license expiration dates to 2032 and 2033 and requested FPL's input on the decision's implications by March 31. This reversal reflects a broader trend of the Biden-appointed NRC reassessing prior decisions made under the Trump administration.
gmax137
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
3,124
Reaction score
3,582
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/environment/article258736018.html

In an unusual move, the federal government effectively reversed its decision to allow the Turkey Point nuclear power plant to continue running until mid-century, ordering a new review of potential environmental risks associated with its operation along southern Biscayne Bay.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s order, issued Monday, is a flip-flop of a 2019 decision by the previous commission to extend Florida Power & Light’s operating license for the two reactors to an unprecedented 80 years — until 2052 for one and 2053 for the other. In doing so, the agency —which oversees the nation’s network of nuclear power plants — had accepted an earlier and older environmental impact statement FPL had submitted when it was granted a previous 20-year extension.

But it does give environmentalists, who filed legal challenges of the 2019 decision, another shot at re-upping their concerns that federal regulators didn’t adequately consider the risks of climate change and sea level rise-driven flooding when granting the last extension.

The NRC ordered its staff to change the expiration of the operating license back to 2032 and 2033 and also asked FPL to submit its opinion on the “practical effects” of the decision by March 31.

The Turkey Point decision, while unusual, wasn’t the only reversal from the agency. The commission’s decision also undoes a license extension for the Peach Bottom nuclear plant in Pennsylvania, part of a trend of the new President Joe Biden-appointed commission revisiting decisions made by the previous President Donald Trump-appointed commission.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In an unusual move, the federal government effectively reversed its decision to allow the Turkey Point nuclear power plant to continue running until mid-century,
Oh no! :nb) The feds must have figured out that Turkey Point's secret weapon, Jim Hardy, has passed away.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top