[number theory] product of co primes congruent to 1 (mod m)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the product B of integers coprime to m is congruent to 1 or -1 modulo m. This is established through the adaptation of Wilson's theorem, which states that for a prime n, (n-1)! is congruent to -1 (mod n). The participants explore the uniqueness of pairs of coprime integers and their properties under modular arithmetic, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the product of these integers can be grouped into pairs that cancel each other out, confirming the congruence condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with Euler's theorem
  • Knowledge of Wilson's theorem
  • Concept of coprime integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Wilson's theorem in detail
  • Explore Euler's theorem and its applications in number theory
  • Investigate properties of coprime integers in modular systems
  • Learn about generalizations of Wilson's theorem for non-prime integers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in modular arithmetic and its applications in proofs and theorems.

RossH
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let b1 through b_phi(m) be integers between 1 and m that are coprime to m. Let B be the product of these integers. Show that B must be congruent to 1 or -1 (mod m)

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I know that the quantity B appears during the proof of Euler's formula. That is, that a^phi(m) is congruent to 1 (mod m). So I probably have to work from there somehow. I have looked at Wilson's theorem, Euler's theorem, and Fermat's little Theorem. I'm not really sure where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you apply a proof which is similar to the proof of Wilson's theorem?
 
micromass said:
Can't you apply a proof which is similar to the proof of Wilson's theorem?

There is no requirement that m be a prime number. That's where I'm confused.
 
Allright, can you write the proof to Wilson's theorem here?? Then we can see if the proof is adaptable or not... (in fact: this theorem is a generalization of Wilson's theorem for non-primes, so I suspect that an analogous proof should do)
 
micromass said:
Allright, can you write the proof to Wilson's theorem here?? Then we can see if the proof is adaptable or not... (in fact: this theorem is a generalization of Wilson's theorem for non-primes, so I suspect that an analogous proof should do)

Okay, this is how I understand the proof:

To be proved: n>1 is prime iff (n-1)! is congruent to -1 (mod n)
This must be true for 2.
For all integers n>2 in m there exists b in m such that ab is congruent to 1 (mod n).
This b is unique (mod n) [I'm not sure why] and because n is prime, a is congruent to b iff a is 1 or n-1.

So it seems to me that this means that the numbers can be grouped into pairs, where each one will have a pair (b). a*b will always be congruent to 1 based on the number of pairs because n must be odd. No a will have the same pair so this modulus can be raised to an even power, to get 1 [I'm not quite sure why this works].

At least, this is my cursory understanding of the proof.
 
Good, now we're going to try to adapt this proof so that it works in this case.

Take b_1,...,b_{\phi(m)} the integers coprime to m. Our goal is to group them in pairs so that they cancel out.

Try to show the following: if b is coprime to m, then there is a unique a such that ab=1 (mod m). Furthermore, a is also coprime to m.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K