Nutating disk engine perspectives

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stanley514
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk Engine
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the potential of nutating disk engines being developed for military use, with claims of higher power density and low friction compared to reciprocating engines. Participants express skepticism about the engine's efficiency and design, questioning the feasibility of using materials like carbon fiber or ceramics for improved performance without cooling. Concerns are raised about the overall effectiveness of rotary pulse jets and other engine types, with many designs deemed inefficient or flawed. The consensus leans towards the superiority of traditional piston engines, particularly diesel and two-stroke designs, due to their simplicity and reliability in achieving volume changes. Ultimately, the conversation highlights a general distrust of new engine technologies and a preference for proven designs.
Stanley514
Messages
404
Reaction score
2
Recently there was information that military is developing a nutating disk engine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutating_disc_engine"
which, as they hope, will have higher power density, than reciprocating engine.Also some people say,that this is low friction design.
Does anyone know what is pro and contra of this engine type and if it really does have low friction,could it be made of carbon fiber or ceramics,to work with no cooling and have greater efficiency?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've seen this before. Personally I think the design is crap, there's no way it has "low friction" and the compression ratio sucks. Everyone makes stuff up about their design, like "more efficient, lighter, low friction" etc. Most of the time its garbage.
 
Do you know something about other types of engines which could be better than reciprocating?Especially those which have few moving parts and low friction?
As I see, one of main problems of reciprocating engine is unability to make it from ceramics or other heat resistant materials which are presently available.
What do you think about rotary pulse jet or rocket engine similar to this design?
http://conceptengine.tripod.com/conceptengine/id2.html"
Rocket engines have high efficiency,up to 70%.If we will enforce it to rotate around an
axle at optimal RPMs and produce electricity,will it be more efficient than gas turbine?
Or such design is nowhere close to reality?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've seen the rotary pulse jet and its garbage. The efficiency on those is horrific. There are also about 30 rotary engines out there, most of them are also garbage.

I've seen probably 100+ unique designs of engines, both rotary and reciprocating. Most of them are trash, only a handful impressed me. For me the best design is the diesel and perhaps the two stroke diesel. Its probably the simplest design, everything else has problems with sealing/compression/friction, etc.

The truth is, there is no better way to get a volume change than a piston, its the easiest to seal and its linear and the friction only comes from piston rings which is low. Anything else will screw it up.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
741
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K