O: How to solve a 4th order non linear ODE using power series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Koubaros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a 4th order linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by c*y''''(x)+2*c*(1/x)*y'''(x)-y''(x)-(1/x)*y'(x)=0, where c is a constant. Participants suggest using numerical methods and power series to find approximate solutions, noting that Maple provides a solution involving Bessel and Struve functions. The complexity of the problem and the desire for an elegant solution are emphasized, with a consensus that while numerical methods may be necessary, exploring power series is also a viable approach despite the singularity at x=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with power series methods
  • Knowledge of Bessel and Struve functions
  • Experience with numerical methods for ODEs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research power series solutions for linear ODEs
  • Explore numerical methods for solving ODEs using software like Maple
  • Study the properties and applications of Bessel and Struve functions
  • Investigate the implications of singularities in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students dealing with complex differential equations, particularly those interested in numerical methods and series solutions.

Koubaros
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Unfortunately, i have ended up with the following 4th order non linear ODE, in a problem i am recently trying to solve. If anyone could give me a hint on how to proceed or point out to me a useful set of notes that i could look into in order to solve it, it would be great.

c*y''''(x)+2*c*(1/x)*y'''(x)-y''(x)-(1/x)*y'(x)=0

c=constant

You can also take a look at the following link for the ODE
http://briefcase.pathfinder.gr/download/o_koubaros/30374/360156/0/ODE.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maple returns the following solution

y(x) = _C1+_C2*((-1/c)^(1/2)*x*BesselJ(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)+1/2*Pi*(-1/c)^(1/2)*x*(StruveH(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*BesselJ(1, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)-StruveH(1, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*BesselJ(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)))/(-1/c)^(1/2)+_C3*((-1/c)^(1/2)*x*BesselY(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)+1/2*Pi*(-1/c)^(1/2)*x*(StruveH(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*BesselY(1, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)-StruveH(1, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*BesselY(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)))/(-1/c)^(1/2)+_C4*Int(x*StruveH(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*(BesselJ(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*BesselY(1, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)-BesselJ(1, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)*BesselY(0, (-1/c)^(1/2)*x)), x)
 
Even though u can make the substitution
\frac{dy(x)}{dx} \rightarrow u(x)
,which makes it a third order ODE,you cannot solve it exactly,because the coefficients are not constant.Actually the equation is very linear.I can assume u are not too familiar with the classification of ODE-s.Anyway,that's not relevant.
I assume a numerical method might work.Supply initial conditions for the function and its derivatives and a computer software might give you an approximate solution.


Daniel.

EDIT:Maple is a good one...Bessel & Struve... :-p

EDIT 2:One minute faster,Tide! :-p
 
Last edited:
Koubaros,

Incidentally, your DE is NOT nonlinear - it is LINEAR! :-)
 
Sorry

First of all, sorry for the non-linear mistype. Actually it was a "brain" mistype not a "typing" mistype. Anyhow, i was aware of the Maple solution but it does not do any good to me since my problem is rather complex and do need an elegant solution, in order to compare it with solutions from two other domains in my problem.

Unfortunately, it seems like i am going to have to go numerically with this one, which is something that i do not want because it will spoil the symmetry of the equations and of the solution.

Any1 got an idea besides the numericall part, i am all ears!
 
Power series

Hello, has anyone used power series to solve this? Although it's singular at 0, should still be able to get a solution. May look into it but will take time since these are messy and usually need to do a few simple ones before can go to a difficult one.

SD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K