Oddball question about linguistics wrt evolution of language

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the evolution of languages, exploring whether there is a measurable rate of language change similar to genetic evolution. Participants examine the variability in the rate of evolution among different languages, particularly focusing on English and its rapid changes compared to others.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the possibility of establishing a rate of language evolution akin to a molecular clock used in genetics.
  • One participant notes that English evolves more rapidly than many other languages, citing that Norwegian speakers can understand medieval texts without special training, unlike English speakers.
  • Another participant suggests that analyzing the usage of specific old-English words could provide insights into language evolution, but emphasizes that this would not reflect the evolution of the entire language.
  • A participant discusses the criteria for including new words in the Oxford English Dictionary, highlighting the role of usage over time and the potential for slang to lose meaning quickly.
  • One contributor argues that modern languages, particularly English, are evolving more rapidly due to the influence of electronic media and mass communication.
  • A participant introduces a paper discussing a "lexical clock," which attempts to measure language evolution, although they express difficulty in understanding its findings.
  • Another participant asserts that English's status as a global language contributes to its rapid evolution compared to other languages.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that languages evolve at varying rates, with English being highlighted as particularly dynamic. However, there is no consensus on a specific rate of evolution or a unified model to measure it.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference the cultural and historical contexts that may influence language evolution, but these factors remain unresolved and are not universally accepted as definitive explanations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to linguists, language enthusiasts, and those exploring the intersection of language and culture, particularly in the context of evolution and communication.

tomishere
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Has anyone ever tried to establish an approx rate that languages evolve, in a similar way that genetic change was used to establish a molecular clock of sorts? (disclaimer: i know zero about linguistics) thanks someone.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I also know 0 about linguistics and assumed that they all evolve at the same rate as English. PF member Arildno, who is Norwegian, responded that this isn't true. English is about the zippiest language on earth, and other languages stay stable for much longer periods. He said the average Norwegian can pick up a saga written in the middle ages and understand it with no special training. This is not possible with Medieval English.
 
You could take an old-English word and gather statistics about its usage. It wouldn’t say anything about the whole language but might tell you something about the word. As an aside, I prefer the word drift or even evolutionary-drift, as evolution by itself implies a value preference.
 
Using English:

When a word or the usae of the word in a given context becomes a panchreston (the meaning of the word is too broad to convey useful information, or an already existing word has a more precise meaning) it ceases to be used.

From Graeme Diamond of OED on inclusion of new words:
“We require five pieces of printed evidence from five different sources over a period of at least five years before we even consider a word for inclusion. Once these criteria have been met (which, with dartitis, is the case) we take in a broader range of considerations, first and foremost widespread evidence of a word being used in general contexts, but also other factors such as historical importance, and so on, and prioritize on that basis"

Please note the 5 year comment.

One of the reasons is that slang usage can devolve into loss of meaning in a few years. If you recall "heavy" from the late 1960's, it became overused (loss of meaning). The use of heavy to mean profound is not all common among English speakers now. Profound worked better than heavy, so it was "selected" against.

This is a kind of selection process. A value preference.
 
tomishere, Welcome to Physics Forums! :) 

I think it is appropriate to describe modern languages as “continuously evolving”. And I think the “evolution” of English is today more rapid than ever before in history. This is because of the massive quantity of communications today (much of it in English) made possible by means of the electronic media. In ancient times languages were passed on only by word of mouth. Once we began to print books language remained “standardized” until those books were revised. Today we have the opportunity to bring new words into use rapidly by virtue of the vast reach of mass media communication; examples are radio, television, and the internet. Concurrently, many “old-fashioned” words become unpopular and get lost in the dustbin simply because they are not used by writers and speakers any longer.
 
I just found a paper that talks about a "lexical clock" (a la molecular clock) that i came across if anyone still interested in this http://www.cs.rice.edu/~nakhleh/Papers/UCSB09.pdf i can't figure out even after reading this if they established how fast the clock goes, its sort of too academic for me but its pretty interesting study they did
 
All languages "evolve" at varying rates. However English has the advantage of being the most spoken language on Earth as well as the language spoken by the worlds superpowers for hundreds of years. As the focal point of social, cultural and scientifical advancement English changes more than any other language on earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K