On limit of convolution of function with a summability kernel

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter psie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Corollary 2.1 from Fourier Analysis and its Applications by Vretblad, which involves positive summability kernels. The corollary states that if a sequence of functions \( (K_n)_{n=1}^\infty \) is a positive summability kernel on an interval \( I \) and \( f \) is continuous at an interior point \( s_0 \), then the limit of the integral converges to \( f(s_0) \). The participants clarify that the interval \( I \) is indeed of the form \( (-a,a) \) and explore whether positive summability kernels are even functions, confirming that if \( K_n(s) \) is a positive summability kernel, then \( K_n(-s) \) is also a positive summability kernel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrability
  • Familiarity with Fourier Analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of limits and continuity in mathematical functions
  • Experience with change of variables in integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of positive summability kernels in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the change of variables in integrals
  • Investigate the characteristics of even functions in the context of summability kernels
  • Explore additional theorems related to convergence in Fourier Analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of Fourier Analysis, and researchers interested in the properties of summability kernels and their applications in analysis.

psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
I'm stuck at proving a corollary regarding the limit of a convolution with a positive summability kernel and an arbitrary function.
I'm reading the following theorem in Fourier Analysis and its Applications by Vretblad.

Theorem 2.1 Let ##I=(-a,a)## be an interval (finite or infinite). Suppose that ##(K_n)_{n=1}^\infty## is a sequence of real-valued, Riemann-integrable functions defined on ##I##, with the following properties:
1) ##K_n(s)\geq 0##,
2)##\int_{-a}^a K_n(s)ds=1##, and
3) if ##\delta>0##, then ##\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\int_{\delta<|s|<a} K_n(s)ds=0.##
If ##f:I\to\mathbb{C}## is integrable and bounded on ##I## and continuous for ##s=0##, we then have $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-a}^a K_n(s)f(s)ds=f(0).$$

Corollary 2.1 If ##(K_n)_{n=1}^\infty## is a positive summability kernel on the interval ##I##, ##s_0## is an interior point of ##I##, and ##f## is continuous at ##s=s_0##, then $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\int_I K_n(s)f(s_0-s)ds=f(s_0).$$

The proof is left as an exercise (do the change of variables ##s_0-s=u##.

It's silly, but I'd like to prove the corollary and I'm getting stuck. I'm a little unsure if ##I## in the corollary is also of the form ##(-a,a)##. Moreover, the change of variables as suggested gives us ##s=s_0-u##, so ##K_n(s)## becomes ##K_n(s_0-u)##. Is this a kernel still centered at ##0##? If I'm understanding things right, the author alludes to using $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-a}^a K_n(s)f(s)ds=f(0),$$ from theorem 2.1 to prove the corollary. Appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I is throghout assumed to be of the form (-a,a).

Easier than substitution is to define g(s) \equiv f(s_0 - s) so that g(0) = f(s_0) and apply the theorem to g.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: psie
Thank you @pasmith.

1. Do you know if positive summability kernels (i.e. a sequence of functions satisfying 1), 2) and 3) above) are even functions?
2. It looks to me that if ##K_n(s)## is a positive summability kernel, then so is ##K_n(-s)##. Is this right?

When we make the substitution ##u=-s## in the integral in the corollary, we obtain $$\int_I K_n(-u)f(s_0+u)du,$$ where ##I=(-a,a)## remains unchanged. If ##K_n(-u)=K_n(u)## or if ##K_n(-u)## is also a positive summability kernel over ##I##, and we set ##s_0=0##, then we can apply the theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K