Operator which is written in k space

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Space
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an operator expressed in k space, specifically in the form H = Ʃkckak, where a_k and c_k are operators. The original poster is exploring the implications of the absence of crossterms in this operator and questioning whether this indicates that the operator is diagonalized in the context of linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between the absence of crossterms and the diagonalization of the operator. They question how the operators a_k and c_k relate to the eigenbasis and whether the Hamiltonian can be considered diagonalized based on its structure.

Discussion Status

Some participants are engaging with the original poster's questions, with one suggesting that the sum resembles the product of two diagonal matrices, while another confirms the nature of the operators involved. There is an acknowledgment of the need for more information to clarify the nature of the operator H.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the operators a_k and c_k are specifically the creation and annihilation operators for momentum states, which may influence the interpretation of the Hamiltonian. Additionally, there is a suggestion that the thread may be better suited for a more advanced physics section.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have an operator which is written in k space as something like:

H = Ʃkckak
where a_k and c_k are operators. So it is a sum of operators of different k but there are no crossterms as you can see. Being no crossterms does this mean that the operator is diagonalized in the language of linear algebra. That a matrix is diagonalized means that it is represented in a basis of eigenstates but this is an expansion of an operator so I am not sure.
Edit; any operator is of course an expansion in operators related to the basis of eigenstates {e_k} by the equation:
Ʃi,jle_i><e_jl a_ij
Now to be diagonalized would mean the vanishing of all matrix elements where i≠j. Can this be said about the given Hamiltonian above. How do I know how the c_k and a_k are related to my eigenbasis.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
I have an operator which is written in k space as something like:

H = Ʃkckak
where a_k and c_k are operators. So it is a sum of operators of different k but there are no crossterms as you can see. Being no crossterms does this mean that the operator is diagonalized in the language of linear algebra. That a matrix is diagonalized means that it is represented in a basis of eigenstates but this is an expansion of an operator so I am not sure.

What's the actual question? Your sum looks like the product of two diagonal matrices C and A, where ci is an entry on the diagonal of matrix C and ai is an entry on the diagonal of matrix A. As it seems to me, C and A are the operators, but the entries in the matrices aren't.

Without knowing what the entries in the matrices are, it's hard to say what H is. Otherwise, your sum looks like some inner product to me. More information would be helpful.
 
The a_k and c_k are operators as stated? So its a sum of operators. The a_k is the creation operator for the momentum state lk> and c_k is the anihillation operator for the same state.
 
Wait I know now. It is of course because the product a_k c_k is just the number operator.
 
This thread is probably more appropriate in the Adv. Physics section, so I'm moving it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K