Operators and Commutators help

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TIGERHULL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutators Operators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics, specifically how to express a Hermitian operator A in terms of its orthonormal eigenstates and eigenvalues. The participants are seeking guidance on how to approach the problem, which involves the use of the unit operator and induction.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem asking how to express a Hermitian operator A using its eigenstates and eigenvalues.
  • Another participant notes that the unit operator can be expressed as the sum of the outer products of the eigenstates.
  • A third participant acknowledges the assumption about the unit operator but still requests further guidance on how to start solving the problem.
  • A fourth participant suggests that the relationship is evident from the definition of the unity operator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on how to begin solving the problem, as participants express varying levels of understanding and seek additional clarification.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the definition of the unity operator and its implications, but there are unresolved steps regarding the application of these concepts to the problem at hand.

TIGERHULL
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have this question for a problem sheet:

Use the unit operator to show that a Hermitian operator A can be written in terms of its orthonormal eigenstates ln> and real eigenvalues a as :

A=(sum of) ln>a<nl

and hence deduce by induction that A^k = (sum of) ln>a^k<nl

I have no idea where to begin and was wondering if someone could give me some pointers and help me work through it. Also, sorry about my notation

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are probably assumed to know that [tex]1 = \sum_n |n\rangle \langle n|[/tex], where 1 means the unit operator.
 
Yes we are, sorry it says that as well. Any pointers on where to begin still?
 
Sure, but I think it's rather obvious as the question already says is: A = 1A = A1 (that's the definition of the unity operator, btw).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K