Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Optical eyepieces for star observations

  1. Nov 14, 2017 #1
    Hello, can I ask you if you have some experience with hyperion modular eyepiece adapter? I would like to know what is its main advantages compare to standard eyepiece ( as it is about ten times more expensive..)

    thank ou....
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2017 #2

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Hi Tomas,

    is this what you are talking about ? ....

    baader_hyperion-aspheric_eyepiece_-_31mm_hyp-31_2454631.jpg


    the left part is a Hyperion Eyepiece with a 2" barrel
    the right part is an adaptor that screws into the end of the eyepiece to reduce the 2" barrel down to a 1.25" barrel
    this is for telescopes that don't have a 2" eyepiece holder

    Is that what you wanted to know ?

    Dave
     
  4. Nov 14, 2017 #3

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

  5. Nov 15, 2017 #4
    Hi , yes it is exactly what I am talking about... I have just 1,25" eyep. holder. Do you have some experience with this one,...?

    thank you
     
  6. Nov 15, 2017 #5

    Drakkith

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Hi bruha. Can you elaborate on what you're asking? Do you currently have an eyepiece that you want to use with an adapter, are you wanting to buy an eyepiece with adapter to use in your 1.25" focuser, or something else?
     
  7. Nov 15, 2017 #6
    Yes, I have a few of these.
    What do you consider to be a "standard eyepiece"? Are you referring to a cheap Plössl here?
     
  8. Nov 15, 2017 #7
    Hi ,
    yes I plan to buy these eyepiece with adapter as I have just 1,25" telescope (or thinkink about it) but concerning high price I would like to know if it is really importantly advantageous compared standard eyepiece ?...

    Thank you,...
     
  9. Nov 16, 2017 #8
    I cannot say anything about the Hyperion Aspheric eyepiece, but I do have Hyperion Zoom Mark IV, and I like it a lot..

    There are also 68° modular eyepieces in Baader hyperion series. And as far as I know, all of them (except 24mm) can be adapted to 2" or 1.25" focuser. The focal length should be variable by removing first group of lens or by adding the extensions - that's why it is called modular. Maybe you want to check more about them at this link...

    By standard eyepiece, you mean that it is not modular?
     
  10. Nov 16, 2017 #9
    Thank you, for answer and link... Yes I have just not modular simple eyepiece 20,12, 6, 2,5 mm (telescope 130 *600 mm) . I will check it....
     
  11. Nov 16, 2017 #9
    ANd yes I mean for example Plössl ones -my question in fact was how much and by which way I improve quality of image (what I can see) by using Hyperion compare these standard cheap ones
     
  12. Nov 16, 2017 #10

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    which standard cheap ones ?
    you haven't given any specific brand name examples

    Plossl is a type of eyepiece, not a brand, many companies make plossl's along with other types
     
  13. Nov 16, 2017 #11
    The two major differences will be the apparent field of view and optical aberrations.

    More expensive eyepieces, like the Hyperions, are designed using multiple lens groups to give a much wider field of view. The Hyperions have a field of view of ##{68}^{\circ}## while a Plössl is around ##{50}^{\circ}##.

    Cheaper eyepieces often have inferior optics which cause issues like chromatic aberration, ghost images, and even distortion of the image.

    The optical issues are often most noticeable when observing bright objects like the moon, planets, or stars.
     
  14. Nov 17, 2017 #12
  15. Dec 10, 2017 #13
    Hi I made some shots by webcamera eyepiece adapter of belelgeuse (right) and other star (left) -I am not sure which one probably from Gemini constellation.It seems me little strange that betelgeuse looks "cooler-etc high temperature" although it is red giant with low temperature..... betelgeuse.png
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Dec 10, 2017 #14

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    probably just a result of poor colour rendering by the webcam
     
  17. Dec 10, 2017 #15
    I i see, thanks, I will look on it..
     
  18. Dec 11, 2017 #16
    HI and here is some moon 1) i think up is m. serenatis and posidenius cr.) 2) I am not sure:wink:
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Dec 11, 2017 #17

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award


    awesome effort
    Was that with the web cam ?
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted