Orbiting Eternally: Physics Q&A with Steven

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephanus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    energy entropy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of whether two celestial bodies can orbit each other eternally without external influence and the implications of energy in such a scenario. Participants explore the nature of stable orbits, the potential for eternal motion, and factors that could influence orbital decay, including gravitational waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Steven questions if two celestial bodies can orbit each other eternally without external influence and whether this process requires energy.
  • Some participants suggest that if two bodies are in a stable orbit, it would require energy to change that orbit, implying they could continue indefinitely unless acted upon by an external force.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the universe being open or flat and its implications for the longevity of such orbits, with some uncertainty about the concept of an "end of time."
  • One participant notes that while stable orbits may persist, there are factors such as gravitational waves that could lead to energy loss and eventual orbital decay, particularly in massive bodies like neutron stars.
  • Another participant mentions that satellite orbits decay due to influences from other celestial bodies, suggesting that not all orbits are stable over long periods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the permanence of orbits, with some arguing that stable orbits can last indefinitely while others point out factors that could lead to decay. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the long-term behavior of orbits in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of orbital mechanics and the influence of external forces, but there is no consensus on the conditions under which orbits may decay or remain stable over time.

Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Dear PF Forum,

I have a question to ask,

Can two celestial bodies orbiting each other eternally without external influence? Does this process need energy?

Thanks for any answer

Steven
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You've got the question a bit backwards: if two bodies are in a stable orbit it would require energy to get them to change
 
phinds said:
You've got the question a bit backwards: if two bodies are in a stable orbit it would require energy to get them to change
Thanks Phinds for the answer, I remember you answer me about the shape of the universe with balloonanalogy. It's the best explanation I've ever got.
So about this eternal orbit.
Suppose the universe is open or flat, and the orbit doesn't change, what I want to know is, that it can orbit for trillion of years till the end of time? (if there is such thing as end of time in open/flat universe)

Steven.
 
Stephanus said:
Thanks Phinds for the answer, I remember you answer me about the shape of the universe with balloonanalogy. It's the best explanation I've ever got.
So about this eternal orbit.
Suppose the universe is open or flat, and the orbit doesn't change, what I want to know is, that it can orbit for trillion of years till the end of time? (if there is such thing as end of time in open/flat universe)

Steven.
That's a reasonable question and I don't know for sure but since it would take energy to change the stable orbit, I see no reason why it wouldn't just go on forever. Basically, if it goes on for 1 second with no change (and I mean NO change, not just no measurable change) then it should go on forever absent the application of any new force.

I'm not an expert in celestial mechanics and it's possible that there is some reason that orbits decay with time. I know that satellite orbits decay with time but I think that's because they are not in a simple 2-body relationship with the Earth.
 
phinds said:
...that orbits decay with time. I know that satellite orbits decay with time but I think that's because they are not in a simple 2-body relationship with the Earth.

Yeah, Phinds. The earth, Mars altough it's far away, sun, Earth ocean tides, etc can cause satellite orbits decay.

Thanks for the answer though
 
In addition to the above..

If the bodies are very massive and orbit close together they should emit gravitational waves and this lost energy can cause them to move closer together until they collide.

Wijipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave#Wave_amplitudes_from_the_Earth.E2.80.93Sun_system

..calculates that for ...

Two Neutron stars... "the gravitational radiation from them would be 1.38×10^28 watts, which is about 100 times more than the Sun's electromagnetic radiation".

For the Earth sun system..."only 200 joules per second [200W] is lost through gravitational radiation, leading to a decay in the orbit by about 1×10^−15 meters per day or roughly the diameter of a proton. At this rate, it would take the Earth approximately 1×10^13 times more than the current age of the Universe to spiral onto the Sun".

So it's significant for Neutron stars but not most planets.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K