Orders of Magnitude Estimation Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the number of passengers that can be transported from the U.K. to Australia using jet fuel consumption data. The annual global production of jet fuel is noted as 783 million liters, with an airplane consuming 0.03 liters per passenger per kilometer over a distance of 15,223 km. Participants clarify that the plane does not need to account for a return flight, simplifying the calculation. A key point is to establish an equation linking the total fuel available to the number of passengers, which helps in solving for the estimated passenger count. The importance of careful rounding in calculations is emphasized to avoid significant errors in the final estimation.
Physiona
Messages
131
Reaction score
9
Hello, I'm sort of stuck with this order of magnitude question I have came across.
Q: The annual global production of jet fuel in 2010 was approximately 783 million litres.
An aeroplane consumes 0.03 litres of jet fuel per passenger for every kilometre it flies.
Estimate the number of passengers could be transported from the U.K to Australia every year. (A distance of 15223 Km)

I know that I have to round each value to the power of 10, but the estimation of passengers confused me. I'm not sure what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show us as far as you can get and then we can help guide you.
 
You don't need to know how many passengers are on each plane, because the info you have gives the jet fuel consumed per passenger per kilometer. The biggest question here is, does the plane need to fly back on a return flight? If so, how much fuel does it use? For the purpose at hand, you could probably assign the number zero to this. ## \\ ## Additional item: In the future, please use the homework template for homework questions.
 
Charles Link said:
You don't need to know how many passengers are on each plane, because the info you have gives the jet fuel consumed per passenger per kilometer. The biggest question here is, does the plane need to fly back on a return flight? If so, how much fuel does it use? For the purpose at hand, you could probably assign the number zero to this. ## \\ ## Additional item: In the future, please use the homework template for homework questions.
Thank you for the reply. No the plane doesn't need to fly back, as it doesn't appoint that in the question. So far, I have calculated the orders of magnitude which I have to round to. According to my teacher, I rounded 783 million to 100,000,000 million and I rounded 0.03 to 0.01, and 15,223 to 10,000. Then I did 0.01 X 10,000 which equals to 100Km. I know 0.01 L is for 1 passenger for every KM, but I'm stuck on the bit where I have to estimate how many passengers it can carry. I understand the logical method but the tricky part is applying it to the estimation.
Thank you.
(I would assign the template, but it's locked and I cannot copy it here as its filtered through my email as my teacher has sent it directly, sorry)
 
This rounding off prescription is weird. How many litres for one passenger to fly from UK to AU ?
 
You should be able to write an equation where ## x ## is the number of passengers, and ## x ## multiplied by a couple of things is equal to the available fuel. Once you have that equation, you can solve it for ## x ##.
 
BvU said:
This rounding off prescription is weird. How many litres for one passenger to fly from UK to AU ?
It's given in the question. That's all the actual question provides. The plane will consume 0.03L per passenger for every kilometre it flies. But when I used orders of magnitude, it apparently rounds to 0.01L
 
Charles Link said:
You should be able to write an equation where ## x ## is the number of passengers, and ## x ## multiplied by a couple of things is equal to the available fuel. Once you have that equation, you can solve it for ## x ##.
Thank you for your reply. But how do I link the order of magnitude to that? As I have to use it.
 
Physiona said:
Thank you for your reply. But how do I link the order of magnitude to that? As I have to use it.
I would wait until you get the final answer to them turn it into an order of magnitude calculation. If you start rounding up one factor of 3 and then round down another, if those approximations go in opposite directions, pretty soon you can be off by a factor of 10, which is an order of magnitude off. Even the number ##.03 ## that they give you is already rounded off somewhat. A number like 783 you can round off to 800, but there is no need to initially round it off to 1000.
 
  • Like
Likes Physiona
  • #10
Charles Link said:
I would wait until you get the final answer to them turn it into an order of magnitude calculation. If you start rounding up one factor of 3 and then round down another, if those approximations go in opposite directions, pretty soon you can be off by a factor of 10, which is an order of magnitude off. Even the number ##.03 ## that they give you is already rounded off somewhat. A number like 783 you can round off to 800, but there is no need to initially round it off to 1000.
Oh okay, so I don't have to use the orders of magnitude to round the values to the powers of 10, right, and I round my final answer to an order of magnitude? (If that's what you are trying to say) I'll do it, and I'll show you my working out . Thank you.
 
  • #11
BvU said:
This rounding off prescription is weird. How many litres for one passenger to fly from UK to AU ?
Physiona said:
It's given in the question. That's all the actual question provides.
What is? The prescription, or the .03 l/km ?
The plane will consume 0.03L per passenger for every kilometre it flies. But when I used orders of magnitude, it apparently rounds to 0.01L
No. One kilometre fuel is given -- in one decimal accuracy.
So 15523 km use up 450 litres -- 500 if you insist on crude rounding off.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
37K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
27K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K