Orthogonality of timelike and null vector

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nomather1471
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the orthogonality of timelike and null vectors within the framework of Lorentzian geometry. It establishes that if vector X is timelike and vector Y is orthogonal to X, then Y must be spacelike. The analysis employs an orthonormal basis for the tangent space T_p M, demonstrating that the conditions of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality confirm the spacelike nature of Y. The participants emphasize the utility of Lorentz transformations in simplifying calculations related to these vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentzian geometry and spacetime concepts
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in vector spaces
  • Knowledge of orthonormal bases in tangent spaces
  • Basic principles of vector transformations, particularly Lorentz transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz transformations on vector properties in spacetime
  • Explore the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the properties of spacelike, timelike, and null vectors in more depth
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of orthonormal bases in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students of geometry, physicists working with relativity, and mathematicians interested in the properties of vectors in spacetime will benefit from this discussion.

nomather1471
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Can we show orthogonality of timelike and null vector?
u0rkg.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If X is timelike, and Y is orthogonal to X, then Y is spacelike.
 
I just want to expand upon what George said. Let ##(M,g)## be a space-time and ##p\in M##. Furthermore, let ##X## be a time-like vector in ##T_p M## and ##Y## a non-zero vector in ##T_p M## such that ##g_p(X,Y) = 0##. Finally, let ##\{e_i \}## be an orthonormal basis for ##T_p M## so that ##X = X^i e_i## and ##Y = Y^i e_i##.

Then ##(X^2)^2 + (X^3)^2 + (X^4)^2 < (X^1)^2## and ##X^1 Y^1 = X^2 Y^2 + X^3Y^3 + X^4Y^4##.
Note this immediately implies that ##(X^1)^2 > 0## and that ##(Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2 > 0##.

Therefore (X^1 Y^1)^2 \leq ((X^2)^2 + (X^3)^2 + (X^4)^2)((Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2)&lt; (X^1)^2((Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2) thus ##(Y^1)^2 < (Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2## i.e. ##Y## is space-like.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
WannabeNewton said:
Finally, let ##\{e_i \}## be an orthonormal basis

WLOG, choose ##X = \{e_0 \}##.
 
A time-like vector can be Lorentz transformed to be purely time-like:x^\mu=(t,0).
A null vector always has x=t, so they can't be orthogonal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WannabeNewton said:
I just want to expand upon what George said. Let ##(M,g)## be a space-time and ##p\in M##. Furthermore, let ##X## be a time-like vector in ##T_p M## and ##Y## a non-zero vector in ##T_p M## such that ##g_p(X,Y) = 0##. Finally, let ##\{e_i \}## be an orthonormal basis for ##T_p M## so that ##X = X^i e_i## and ##Y = Y^i e_i##.

Then ##(X^2)^2 + (X^3)^2 + (X^4)^2 < (X^1)^2## and ##X^1 Y^1 = X^2 Y^2 + X^3Y^3 + X^4Y^4##.
Note this immediately implies that ##(X^1)^2 > 0## and that ##(Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2 > 0##.

Therefore (X^1 Y^1)^2 \leq ((X^2)^2 + (X^3)^2 + (X^4)^2)((Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2)&lt; (X^1)^2((Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2) thus ##(Y^1)^2 < (Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2## i.e. ##Y## is space-like.
I think you have to show that:
(X^1 Y^1)^2 \leq ((X^2)^2 + (X^3)^2 + (X^4)^2)((Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2)
 
nomather1471 said:
I think you have to show that:
(X^1 Y^1)^2 \leq ((X^2)^2 + (X^3)^2 + (X^4)^2)((Y^2)^2 + (Y^3)^2 + (Y^4)^2)

I had forgotten completely that one has the freedom to Lorentz boost to a frame wherein ##X = e_0## as stated by George and Clem above, which makes the calculation much simpler. Nevertheless, the above inequality follows directly from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
 
I am student at geometry so your notation is quite different for me but thanks for everyone for all replies...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K