Otimes notation and tau matrices used in definition of gamma matrices?

Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
In Zee's Quantum Field theory book he writes

\begin{align}\gamma^0 &= \begin{bmatrix}I & 0 \\ 0 & -I\end{bmatrix}=I \otimes \tau_3 \\ \gamma^i &= \begin{bmatrix}0 & \sigma^i \\ \sigma^i & 0\end{bmatrix}=\sigma^i \otimes \tau_2 \\ \gamma^5 &=\begin{bmatrix}0 & I \\ I & 0\end{bmatrix}=I \otimes \tau_1 \end{align}

The Pauli matrices \sigma^i I've seen. However, I have two questions

1) What are these \tau_i matrices?
2) I'm not familiar with this \otimes notation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
strangerep said:
Try Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_product#Kronecker_product_of_two_matrices

That should also allow you to reverse-engineer the tau matrices... :-)

I find that the tau matrices are just the sigma matrices. Odd that two different notations would be used. One notation when defining the gamma matrices in terms sigmas directly, and an entirely different notation when using the tensor product?
 
Peeter said:
I find that the tau matrices are just the sigma matrices.
... which is what Zee says beneath his eq(4) on p90.

Odd that two different notations would be used. One notation when defining the gamma matrices in terms sigmas directly, and an entirely different notation when using the tensor product?

I don't use tau's myself.

BTW, your earlier expression for gamma^i doesn't match Zee's.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top