Overdetermined SDE and other problems

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter econslc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an overdetermined dynamical system arising from an economic problem, characterized by a Jacobian with a zero determinant and potential issues related to stability and divergence. Participants explore the mathematical properties of the system, including fixed points and qualitative features, while considering numerical approaches and formal analyses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a dynamical system with equations that lead to overdetermination due to the proportionality of the third and fourth equations.
  • Another suggests removing the third equation and substituting for x3 to simplify the analysis.
  • A participant provides a local analysis near a singular point at x1=0, deriving equilibrium points and an eigenvalue equation based on small perturbations.
  • There is mention of instability in the system depending on the sign of a parameter, but this conclusion is noted as needing revision.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the model's specification and seeks guidance on formal analysis and references.
  • Another participant acknowledges the suggestions provided and indicates a willingness to explore them further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to analyze the system, with multiple competing views on how to handle the overdetermined nature and the implications of the singular point. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall validity and specification of the model.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations such as the dependence on specific assumptions about the parameters and the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps involved in the analysis.

econslc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am working with an economic problem and have ended up with the following dynamical system which is overdetermined, Jacobian has zero determinant (so one zero eigenvalue?) and probably other problems. The system looks something like this:

dot{x1}=c1 x_2+c2 x_4/(x_2 x_1)
dot{x2}=x_3*(1-x_1)+c3
dot{x3}=c4 x_1
dot{x4}=c5 x_1

where c are parameters or constants. For overall stability first condition requires an x_1 s.t. dot{x_3}=dot{x_4}=0. Next even if that is not the case I still want to say something about how fast the system diverges. In any case if I assume the condition and get a fixed point for x_1, it means I can solve for x_3 from dot{x_2}=0 but then I end up with one equation dot{x_1} and two unknowns x_4 and x_2. Mathematically that can not be solved without further assumptions. Should/Can I do that numerically? Is there a formal people approach this problems?

I have been playing around with some data and I can get a feel about how fast the model diverges based on the choices for the parameters. My question is, can I can analyze in a formal way any qualitative features of such model, or is it simply badly specified and I should just forget about it? Any references you can direct me to would be very much appreciated. Finally I tried playing with this model in Mathematica with NDSolve but it gives me "overdetermined" error. Any way to get around that?
Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is overdetermined because third and fourth equations are proportional. Repeat the analysis removing the third equation, and setting [tex]x_{3}=c_{6}+\frac{c_{4}}{c_{5}} x_{4}[/tex]
By the way, the equation is singular at [tex]x_{1}=0[/tex]
 
Here is how you make the local analysis, after eliminating x3 from there. As x1=0 is singular, we will try [tex]x_{1}=\epsilon\rightarrow 0[/tex]. The equilibrium points are
[tex]x_{1}=\epsilon , x_{4}=-c_{5}(c_{3}+c_{6})/c_{4} , x_{2}=\gamma/\epsilon^{1/2}[/tex]

Where [tex]\gamma=\pm \sqrt(\frac{c_{2} c_{5}}{c_{1} c_{4}}(c_{3}+c_{6}))[/tex]. After computing the Jacobian, the eigenvalue equation is given by:

[tex]\epsilon^{3/2}\Lambda^{3}-\gamma \Lambda^{2}-[\epsilon c_{2}c_{5}/(c_{1}\gamma)+2c_{1}c_{3}\epsilon^{3/2}]\Lambda-2c_{1}c_{4}\epsilon^{3/2}=0[/tex]

For small values of [tex]\epsilon[/tex], you get the following approximation:

[tex]\Lambda_{1}\sim \gamma\epsilon^{-3/2}+O(\epsilon^{1/2})[/tex]

[tex]\Lambda_{2,3}\sim \frac{c_{2}c_{5}}{2\gamma^{2}c_{1}}(-1\pm i)\epsilon^{1/2}[/tex]

Showing instability in the direction corresponding to the first eigenvalue, for [tex]\gamma>0[/tex], and stability otherwise.

This needs some revising...
 
Last edited:
Gato, thanks a lot for taking the time to answer my post. I will work on your suggestions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K