Oxidizing power of potassium chlorate vs. nitrate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxidizing Power
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Potassium chlorate (ClO3-) is established as a stronger oxidizing agent than potassium nitrate (NO3-) based on standard reduction potentials. The standard electrode potential for chlorate is +1.64 V, while for nitrate it is +0.94 V. This indicates that chlorate has a higher capacity to accept electrons, making it a more effective oxidizer. The comparison of these potentials confirms that chlorate is indeed a stronger oxidizing agent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of standard reduction potentials
  • Familiarity with electrochemical cells
  • Knowledge of oxidation-reduction reactions
  • Basic chemistry concepts related to anions and their behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the standard reduction potentials of other common oxidizing agents
  • Learn about electrochemical cell design and measurement techniques
  • Explore the applications of potassium chlorate in various chemical reactions
  • Study the implications of oxidation-reduction reactions in industrial processes
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, chemical engineers, and professionals in the field of electrochemistry seeking to understand the comparative oxidizing strengths of chemical agents.

Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
I was wondering how much stronger potassium chlorate is vs. potassium nitrate in oxidizing power, and how to look up the information for myself next time if possible. Thanks :smile:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Find the reduction potential for the anions and compare.
 
I know my elements and took high school chemistry, but I tried looking up what you said and it's a little bit over my head. Could you explain it a different way?
 
Standard reduction potentials are basically values of electrochemical potentials versus a standard hydrogen electrode, as you may know if an agent is labeled a reducing agent in an chemistry equation it becomes oxidized - it is the electron donor. The opposite applies for an oxidizing agent - it is responsible for taking away the electrons. Standard hydrogen electrodes are given the value of zero and an galvanic electrochemical setup is designed with it at the cathode and an anode setup with the oxidizing agent of your choice and then the voltage difference is measured between the anode and the cathode. The greater the value of this voltage the better the anode agent is as an oxidizing agent in a relative sense.

From what I remember, the more positive the potential, the better the oxidizing agent.
 
Man, I don't know. I guess I get the answer my question asks for but, I was hoping for an integer or something.
 
i have some standard electrode values.

OCl^{-}_{(aq)} + H^{+}_{(aq)} + e^{-} \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{2}Cl_{2(aq)} + 2H_{2}O_{(l)}

emf = + 1.64 V

NO^{-}_{3(aq)} + 3H^{+}_{(aq)} + 2e^{-} \Leftrightarrow HNO_{2(aq)} + H_{2}O_{(l)}

emf = + 0.94 V


therefore, the chlorate(1) is a stronger oxidising agent.
 
Last edited:
Kushal said:
i have some standard electrode values.

OCl^{-}_{(aq)} + H^{+}_{(aq)} + e^{-} \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{2}Cl_{2(aq)} + 2H_{2}O_{(l)}

emf = + 1.64 V

NO^{-}_{3(aq)} + 3H^{+}_{(aq)} + 2e^{-} \Leftrightarrow HNO_{2(aq)} + H_{2}O_{(l)}

emf = + 0.94 V


therefore, the chlorate(1) is a stronger oxidising agent.
Chlorate is

ClO_3^{-}

not

ClO^{-}
 
oooops... yeah it is ClO3-
 
Kushal said:
emf = + 1.64 V

emf = + 0.94 V

therefore, the chlorate(1) is a stronger oxidising agent.
Does this mean it is 1.7x stronger?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K