Parameterizing conditional expectations (Gaussian case)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of conditional expectations for jointly normally distributed random variables X, Y, and Z. The formula E[Z | X>x, Yx, Y PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of jointly normally distributed random variables
  • Familiarity with conditional expectations in probability theory
  • Knowledge of the Tower Law in expectation calculations
  • Concept of regression coefficients in statistical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of jointly normal distributions
  • Learn about the Tower Law and its applications in probability
  • Explore regression analysis, focusing on regression coefficients
  • Investigate advanced topics in conditional expectations
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and researchers working with multivariate normal distributions and those interested in advanced probability theory and regression analysis.

estebanox
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Consider three jointly normally distributed random variables X,Y and Z.

I know that in the Gaussian case E[Z | X,=x Y=y]=xßZX;Y +yßZY;X
where ßZX;Y notes the regression coefficient of Z on X conditional on Y (and ßZY;Xis analogously defined).

Is the following derivation correct?

E[Z| X>x, Y<y] = E [ E[Z | X,Y] | X>x, Y<y]
ZX;Y E[X | X>x, Y<y]+ßZY;X E[Y |X>x, Y<y]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is correct.
The first equality is an application of the Tower Law.
The second equality actually comprises two steps:
1. substitute your formula for E[Z | X,Y] from above for the inner expectation
2. Use the linearity of the expectation operator and the fact that the betas are constants to get the result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
andrewkirk said:
Yes it is correct.
The first equality is an application of the Tower Law.
The second equality actually comprises two steps:
1. substitute your formula for E[Z | X,Y] from above for the inner expectation
2. Use the linearity of the expectation operator and the fact that the betas are constants to get the result.
Great! Thanks a lot for spelling it out
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K