PARI/GP or comparable number theory program?

Click For Summary
PARI/GP and comparable number theory programs can run on MacBook Pro, with options like ARIBAS and SageMath available. ARIBAS lacks built-in complex arithmetic but allows for custom scripts, while SageMath integrates PARI/GP into a more comprehensive symbolic algebra system with a user-friendly interface. PARI/GP is still downloadable, though installation may be complex, and users can also build it from source if preferred. Detailed instructions for building PARI/GP from source are provided, including necessary commands. Exploring these alternatives can enhance the experience of working with large complex functions in number theory.
DirichletHole
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
i'm trying to find a version of PARI or PARI/GP or a comparable number theory program that will run on my MacBook Pro.
if anyone knows of a site with an updated version or an emulator that will get older versions of PARI working on my computer or newer and better software for testing out long complex functions that generate very large numbers please let me know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pari-GP is now a 'package' that has been incorporated into Sage, a free symbolic algebra system. See sagemath.org

Alternatively, Pari GP is still available for download and will work on your MacBook Pro. The installation is a bit fiddly though.
 
I'd say Sage is probably better, since it's newer, has a GUI, and contains more than just PARI/GP. But if you really want PARI/GP, you probably can just build it from source. Have you tried building it yourself?

Extract http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/unix/pari-2.5.1.tar.gz in a folder and run:
Code:
$ cd [folder]
$ ./Configure
$ make
# make install
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
830
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K