MHB Parrot Guy's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a summation proof by induction

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Mathematical Induction Problem help?



Use Mathematical Induction to prove the following statement:

2 + 10 + 24 + 44 + . . . + n(3n - 1) = n^2(n+1)

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Parrot Guy,

We are given to prove:

$$\sum_{j=1}^n\left(j(3j-1) \right)=n^2(n+1)$$

First, we check to see if the base case $P_1$ is true:

$$\sum_{j=1}^1\left(j(3j-1) \right)=1^2(1+1)$$

$$1(3\cdot1-1)=1(1+1)$$

$$2=2$$

The base case is true, so next we state the induction hypothesis $P_k$:

$$\sum_{j=1}^k\left(j(3j-1) \right)=k^2(k+1)$$

As our induction step, we may add $$(k+1)(3(k+1)-1)$$ to both sides:

$$\sum_{j=1}^k\left(j(3j-1) \right)+(k+1)(3(k+1)-1)=k^2(k+1)+(k+1)(3(k+1)-1)$$

On the left, incorporate the new term into the summation and on the right, factor and distribute:

$$\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\left(j(3j-1) \right)=(k+1)\left(k^2+3k+2 \right)$$

Factor further on the right:

$$\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\left(j(3j-1) \right)=(k+1)(k+1)(k+2)$$

Rewrite the right side:

$$\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\left(j(3j-1) \right)=(k+1)^2((k+1)+1)$$

We have derived $P_{k+1}$ from $P_{k}$ thereby completing the proof by induction.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top