Particle bound by quadratic potential

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 6K views
kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A particle that can move in one dimension and that is in a stationary state, is bound by a potential V(x) = (1/2)kx^2. The wave function is [tex]\Psi[/tex](x,t) = [tex]\psi[/tex](x)exp(-iEt/[tex]\hbar[/tex])

We look at a state in which [tex]\psi[/tex](x) = Aexp(-x^2/2a^2a^2), where a is a constant and A is the normalisation constant. Determine a so that [tex]\psi[/tex](x) is an energy state. What is the energ of the particle?

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know what to do here, but setting up the wave equation tends to be a good start:

H[tex]\psi[/tex](x) = E[tex]\psi[/tex](x), where H = -([tex]\hbar[/tex]^2/2m)(d^2/dx^2) + kx^2/2

How can I determine a so that [tex]\psi[/tex](x) is an energy state?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just calculate the left-hand and right-hand sides, and set them equal.
 
That the wave function is an energy state simply means that it's described by the Schrödinger equation?
 
Yes, it's a solution to the *time-independent* SE, to be precise.
 
OK, but I still don't see how to find a when E is unknown. My expression after differentiating twice is:

([tex]\hbar[/tex]^2/2ma^2) (A - x^2/a^2) + kx^2/2 = E
 
First, you didn't calculate it right.

Second, the correct equation you'll get will have to be true for every x.
 
Now I ended up with

([tex]\hbar[/tex]^2/2ma^2)(1 - x^2/a^2) + kx^2/2 = E

What I should do here is to eliminate x so that the equation holds for all x-es? In that case, a must be ([tex]\hbar[/tex]^2/km)^0.25
 
Your equation is now of the form (if you move E to the left-hand side)

C+Dx^2=0,

where C and D are constants (independent of x).
If this is to be true for all x, then both C and D must be zero.
 
I got it right now, didn't I?

My next problem is to calculate the expectation value. That's not hard, I just wonder why the integral is written

[tex]\int[/tex]dx [tex]\psi[/tex]*(x)x[tex]\psi[/tex](x)

and not

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\psi[/tex]*(x)x[tex]\psi[/tex](x) dx
 
Last edited:
In this case it doesn't matter where you put the "dx", it is the same thing.

(note that there are cases where it DOES matter; e.g. if dx is a vector)