Hi all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am currently having trouble with an exercise: writing the propagator of a particle coupled to a magnetic field.

So the lagrangian is [itex]L_A (\vec{x},\dot{\vec{x}}^2) = \frac{m}{2}\dot{\vec{x}} + e\vec{A}.\dot{\vec{x}}[/itex]

And it says that I should solve it in two different ways:

-by writing [itex]e\vec{A}.\dot{\vec{x}}[/itex] has a derivative relative to t

-by completing the square in the Lagrangian, ie something like [itex]L_A (\vec{x},\dot{\vec{x}}) = \frac{m}{2}(\dot{\vec{x}}+\frac{e}{m}\vec{A})^2 - \frac{e^2}{2m}\vec{A}^2[/itex] I guess.

But still, I develop a few lines more of calculus but I am stuck. I would be really happy if someone could explain how to proceed.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Path integral for a particle coupled to a magnetic field

Loading...

Similar Threads - Path integral particle | Date |
---|---|

I Does the path Integral contain virtual particles? | Nov 5, 2017 |

Relation between phase space and path integral formulation? | Apr 22, 2015 |

Two particle Path Integral | Mar 14, 2015 |

Not seeing the action of a free particle in the Path Integral Formulation | Dec 21, 2012 |

Virtual particle in path integral and perturbative approaches | Aug 13, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**