Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Pauli lubanski pseudo vector in spin representation

  1. Oct 4, 2009 #1
    I'm trying to calculate the pauli-lubanski pseudo vector for different representations
    of the poincare group. The first rep is the infinite dimensional "angular momentum"
    rep where the generators of the lorentz part take the form :

    M_ab = x_a*d_b - x_b*d_a (for 3 rotations)
    M_ab = x_a*d_b + x_b*d_a (for 3 boosts)

    (here d_a is partial differentiation with respect to x_a, the indices...should be obvious).

    the momentum part of the generators are :

    P_a = d_a (4 translations)

    The pauli-lubanski pseudo vector is defined :

    W_a = e_abcd * M_bc * P_d

    (e_abcd is antisymmetric levi-civita symbol)

    A bit of a surprise (to me) is that W_a = 0 for this rep! (check it if you like).
    I moved to calculating W_a in a "spin" rep of say dimension N; so now :


    M_ab -> M_ab*I_N + S_ab

    P_a -> P_a * I_N

    where

    S_ab = NxN matrices (6 constant matrices satissfying the lorentz algebra multiplication).
    I_N is NxN identity matrix

    (S_ab and P_c commute : S_ab * P_c = 0) and the pauli-lubanski pseudo vector becomes :

    W_a = e_abcd * S_bc * P_d

    So it seems like each of the four components is an NxN matrix. Even the invariant
    W^a*W_a is an NxN matrix...I assume with eigenvalues equal to some
    multiple of spin(spin+1)...although looking at this matrix that doesn't look obvious.

    Anyway, my question is this : does the above look right? where can I find an
    explicit example where the above calculations are carried out in detail. Also please
    let me know if there's a better place to post this if this is outside the forum's area
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 6, 2009 #2
    Couple of things I'd like to point out (unless you've figured it out by yourself)
    1) The P-L (pseudo) tensor is constructed in a manner so that it receives NO contribution from orbital ang. mom. since that can take any arbitrarily large/small integer multiple of h-bar while spin ang. mom. is a CHARACTERISTIC of the particle (i.e represenatation) like mass and hence provides the only non-vanishing contribution. No wonder you found vanishing answer with M_ab.

    2)S_ab-matrix for a spin-j particle (i.e. Lorentz group representation) is (2j+1) dimensional. S_0i=0, S_ij=e_ijk*J^K where J^K's are the usual spin-j matrices e.g. J^3=diag(-j,-j+,...,j-1,j).

    Hope that helps.

    Wriju
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Pauli lubanski pseudo vector in spin representation
Loading...