##P^{\mu}## generates translations and extracts the four-momentum of a particle when it acts on the momentum eigenstate of a particle.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

##J^{\mu\nu}## generates rotations and measures the spin angular momentum along the ##i##-direction of a particle when it acts on the ##i##-th direction spin angular momentum eigenstate of a particle.

The Pauli-Lubanski psuedo-vector is given by ##W_{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{\mu\sigma\rho\tau}J^{\sigma\rho}P^{\tau}## such that ##W_{\mu}|P,j,j_{z}\rangle = -mJ_{i}|P,j,j_{z}\rangle,## where ##|P,j,j_{z}\rangle## is a momentum space eigenstate representing a particle of spin ##j## at rest with ##P^{\mu}=(m,0,0,0)## and ##m\neq 0##.

What is the physical interpretation of ##W_{\mu}##?

To prove that ##[J_{\mu\nu},W^{2}]=0##, an explicit form of ##[J_{\mu\nu},W_{\rho}]## is necessary. One way to obtain ##[J_{\mu\nu},W_{\rho}]## is to define ##I=\frac{i} {8}\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}J^{\alpha\beta}J^{\gamma\delta}## and show that ##W_{\rho}=[I,P_{\rho}]## and ##[J_{\mu\nu},I]=0##.

What is an easy way to show that ##[J_{\mu\nu},I]=0## using the epsilon symbol in ##I##?

##I## is a scalar as all the indices are ##0##, so why can not say that ##[J_{\mu\nu},W^{2}]=0## trivially?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Physical interpretation of Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-vector

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**