MHB PDF of X^2: General Method & Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter nacho-man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pdf Writing
Click For Summary
To find the PDF of Y = X^2 for a positive continuous random variable X, one must first determine the CDF of Y, which is expressed as P(Y < y) = P(X^2 < y) = P(X < √y). The PDF of Y can then be derived by differentiating this CDF with respect to y. The correct formula involves the PDF of X evaluated at √y, multiplied by the derivative of √y. This method clarifies the relationship between the PDFs of X and Y, addressing the initial confusion about their similarity.
nacho-man
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
I just started this topic and have a question:

For a positive continuous random variable X, write down the PDF of Y = X^2 in terms of the PDF of X.

So; writing the PDF of X, I get

P(0<X<∞) =integral from 0 to ∞ fx(x)dx

Is this correct? For Y=X^2, wouldn't the pdf be the exact same thing, since the question asks for positive continuous random variables anyway?

Is there a general method, approach I should have about this. I find pdfs to be confusing, the textbooks are heavy on jargon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nacho said:
I just started this topic and have a question:

For a positive continuous random variable X, write down the PDF of Y = X^2 in terms of the PDF of X.

So; writing the PDF of X, I get

P(0<X<∞) =integral from 0 to ∞ fx(x)dx

Is this correct? For Y=X^2, wouldn't the pdf be the exact same thing, since the question asks for positive continuous random variables anyway?

Is there a general method, approach I should have about this. I find pdfs to be confusing, the textbooks are heavy on jargon.

Welcome to MHB, nacho! :)

Since your questions were sufficiently different to warrant their own threads, I have taken the liberty to split them into 2 threads. We prefer 1 question per thread here (unless the questions are parts of the same problem statement).
Now to address your problem, to find a PDF, the general method is to look at the CDF and take its derivative.

In your case the CDF of Y is:
$$P(Y < y) = P(X^2 < y) = P(X < \sqrt y) = \int_{0}^{\sqrt y} f_X(x) dx$$
Note that the lower boundary can be zero, since X is given to be positive.

To find the PDF of Y, you need to differentiate its CDF.
$$f_Y(y) = \frac{d}{dy}P(Y < y)$$
Now supposed $F_X(x)$ is the anti-derivative of $f_X(x)$, which is actually the same as the CDF of X, then you get:
$$f_Y(y) = \frac{d}{dy}P(Y < y) = \frac{d}{dy}\int_{0}^{\sqrt y} f_X(x) dx
=\frac{d}{dy}\Big(F_X(\sqrt y) - 0\Big) = f_X(\sqrt y) \frac{d}{dy}(\sqrt y)$$

Does that answer your question?
 
Last edited:
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K