News Pension halt for Congress' crooks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
More than 20 citizen groups are advocating for the new Democratic leaders in Congress to implement ethics reforms that would deny pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies. The coalition argues that it is unjust for taxpayers to fund generous retirement packages for lawmakers who violate the law. While there is support for this idea, some participants in the discussion express concerns about fairness, suggesting that retirement benefits should be tied to actions taken while in office rather than actions before or after. The typical congressional pension ranges from $41,000 to $55,000 annually, with higher amounts for those who have served longer. The debate highlights the need for a balance between accountability and fair compensation for public service.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
2,657
WASHINGTON — More than 20 citizen groups are urging the new Democratic leaders in Congress to include in any ethics reform the denial of pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies.

"We must end the practice of rewarding lawmakers who abuse the law with plush pension packages funded by the American taxpayer," the coalition wrote in a letter to be sent today to Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid, who will become speaker of the House and Senate majority leader when Democrats assume control of Congress in January. [continued][/quote]
http://www.azstarnet.com/news/158289

What a novel idea! :rolleyes: Yes, I can get behind that one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ivan Seeking said:
WASHINGTON — More than 20 citizen groups are urging the new Democratic leaders in Congress to include in any ethics reform the denial of pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies.

"We must end the practice of rewarding lawmakers who abuse the law with plush pension packages funded by the American taxpayer," the coalition wrote in a letter to be sent today to Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid, who will become speaker of the House and Senate majority leader when Democrats assume control of Congress in January. [continued]
http://www.azstarnet.com/news/158289

What a novel idea! :rolleyes: Yes, I can get behind that one.

I could agree with that if it were for actions committed while in office.

I don't have a serious problem with yanking retirement benefits for any lawmakers convicted of a felony, but their retirement really is part of the compensation package for the time they serve in Congress. In the interests of fairness, what they do after or before their time in Congress should be irrelevant.

I'd also categorize their pensions as "pretty damn good" rather than plush. The typical pension is around $41,000 to $55,000 a year - but only because most Congressmen don't serve that many years. I think a Congressman needs to serve 5 years before they're eligible to receive a retirement benefit and one serving a single six year Senate term would get $16,500 a year for the rest of their life. Not a bad add-on to whatever job they work the rest of their life considering they only served 6 years. The 'plush' retirements are generally drawn by those that have spent 20 years or more in Congress and have COLA kick in. Some of those that served 30 years in Congress, retired around 50, and still alive around 80 are receiving some pretty hefty retirement money.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/20/commentary/wastler/wastler/index.htm
http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly68.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
13K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K