Perfect Rhythm

  • Context: Music 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of perfect rhythm in music, highlighting the precise matching of tempos between live and studio recordings. The author notes that two versions of a song were within 30 milliseconds of each other, indicating a tempo accuracy of 0.001%. A specific example is provided where a solo vocalist deviated by 60 milliseconds, demonstrating the absence of a clicktrack. Additionally, the conversation touches on the use of metronomes by musicians, emphasizing the importance of phase versus frequency in rhythm consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of musical tempo and rhythm
  • Familiarity with metronome usage in music
  • Knowledge of audio recording techniques
  • Basic concepts of echolocation and sound perception
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of clicktracks on live performances
  • Explore techniques for achieving tempo consistency in recordings
  • Learn about the differences between phase and frequency locking in metronome use
  • Investigate the science of echolocation and its applications in music
USEFUL FOR

Musicians, audio engineers, and music producers interested in enhancing rhythm accuracy and understanding the nuances of live versus studio recordings.

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,739
Reaction score
3,024
Everyone knows about perfect pitch, what about perfect rhythm? I became aware of this when overlaying the live version of a song over the studio recording. As far as tempo goes they were the same. That is, after four minutes of music they two versions were as close to the same tempo as I could measure, which is within about 30 milliseconds. Maybe not perfect but close enough. To get that close of a match the tempos have to be within 0.001% of one another.

Wait, you may say, couldn't they have been using a metronome/clicktrack on the live version? They might except for one thing. There was a section where everyone else dropped out and the singer went completely solo. She took 60 milliseconds more on the live version. I had to cut that out to get them to match. No clicktrack.

In another event, these two completely separate versions by different artists fit together with no editing whatsoever.

 
Science news on Phys.org
I would say "wait - are you sure that's an untouched 'live version'?.
You may not have done editing, but the studio almost certainly did.
See here for details.

Also, the way that a metronome is used my an instrumentalist is discussed here. Musicians seem to do differentiate between locking onto the phase vs. locking onto the frequency. So it is certainly possible to use the same metronome signal before and after the vocalist - just choose a different phase.

On a related note (no pun intended), a person can train themselves to develop some useful level of echolocation. This ability is described in a National Academy of Sciences article. The Google AI describes this a being potentially good to about 6msec (about a 1 meter round trip). That's probably about the best I could do in estimating distances to walls of buildings on a quiet, snow-covered, night-time street.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K