Permenance of Collapsed Wave Function Spin State

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of a particle's spin state after measurement, particularly whether a particle can revert to a superposition state after its wave function has collapsed. Participants explore concepts related to quantum mechanics, superposition, and the implications of measurements on quantum states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Chiral questions whether a particle, once observed and its spin state collapsed, remains in that state indefinitely or can revert to superposition.
  • Some participants clarify that measurement does not reveal a pre-existing spin value but instead defines the state of the particle at the moment of measurement.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which a particle's spin can precess and potentially enter a superposition again, depending on interactions within the system.
  • One participant suggests that while theoretically a particle may revert to superposition immediately after measurement, practical factors influence the timing based on system interactions.
  • Another participant emphasizes that every quantum state can be viewed as a superposition with respect to some observables, complicating the interpretation of superposition and eigenstates.
  • Chiral expresses confusion about conflicting statements regarding the timing of reverting to superposition and whether different interpretations of quantum mechanics allow for multiple valid perspectives.
  • Chiral seeks clarification on the implications of measuring different observables and the relationship to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a particle can revert to superposition after measurement, and there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of superposition and measurement in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of quantum measurement and the varying interpretations of superposition and eigenstates, as well as the dependence on specific system interactions and the timing of measurements.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those exploring the implications of measurement on quantum states and the nature of superposition.

ChiralWaltz
Messages
161
Reaction score
5
Hello Everyone,

General curiosity question.

We start with a particle who is in superposition.

We observe it and collapse its wave function. This is how the particle's spin is determined. Two states can exist, spin up or spin down.

My question is, once we observe the spin state, is the particle locked into that specific spin state forever or can it revert back into superposition?

Assuming the latter may be true, is there a specific amount of time we have to wait for before it re-assumes superposition?

Thank you,
Chiral
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralWaltz said:
This is how the particle's spin is determined.

As an aside, unless I'm misinterpreting what you're saying, you seem to be under the impression that a measurement of the spin of a particle in a superposition of spin states yields the spin the particle possessed before measurement-this is not how superposition is usually interpreted in QM. Rather, when the particle is in such a superposition, it cannot be said to possesses any value of spin at all; the classical notion of particles possessing values for an observable is usually seen as inapplicable in QM for particles in superpositions of eigenstates of an observable. In other words, it is not the case that it possesses a spin that we are ignorant of before measurement.

ChiralWaltz said:
My question is, once we observe the spin state, is the particle locked into that specific spin state forever or can it revert back into superposition?

This depends entirely on the interactions within the system. If we have an electron at rest in a magnetic field (meaning we have the electron be in a momentum eigenstate and boost to the frame in which the associated momentum eigenvalue vanishes) initially in a definite spin state, the spin of the electron will precess as per the time evolution under the Schrödinger equation with the interaction Hamiltonian being given by the coupling of the electron magnetic moment to the external magnetic field. If we then make a measurement of the spin of the electron at an arbitrary instant of its precession and take the resulting spin eigenstate and feed it back into the Schrödinger equation as a new initial condition then it will again precess. The precession will in general have the electron be in a superposition of spin states.

ChiralWaltz said:
Assuming the latter may be true, is there a specific amount of time we have to wait for before it re-assumes superposition?

In theory it happens immediately after but in practical terms it depends on the characteristic time scale of the interactions in the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
You seem to have a misconception about the concept of superposition. Being "in superposition" is not a property of the system. Every system in a definite quantum state is in a superposition state with respect to some observables and in an eigenstate with respect to some other observables. ("eigenstate" is the opposite of superposition; if the system is in an eigenstate of a certain observable, the value of this observable is definite)

After a spin measurement in direction z, your system will be in an eigenstate of the corresponding spin observable. But at the same time, this state is a superposition of spin direction x eigenstates.

Every state is an eigenstate of the spin observable in some direction and every state is a superposition of eigenstates of the spin observable in many other directions.

So your question seems not very meaningful to me.
 
WannabeNewton and kith,

Thank you so much for answering my question. Obviously, I need to be hanging out with Newton more before I play in this forum.

I apologize for incorrectly wording my question and costing you valuable time.

Also, thank you for going into the depth that you did. I am a little unclear on it but that will require reading and math on my part to understand it before I come back to this.

Chiral
 
ChiralWaltz said:
I apologize for incorrectly wording my question and costing you valuable time.
There's nothing to apologize. If one doesn't understand something, the first step is to find good questions. Understanding why a certain question doesn't make sense may improve the overall understanding greatly.
 
WannabeNewton said:

This is helping greatly.

kith said:
There's nothing to apologize. If one doesn't understand something, the first step is to find good questions. Understanding why a certain question doesn't make sense may improve the overall understanding greatly.

I'll work on developing my questions more thoroughly.

Round 2:

I'm confused about the statement made by WannabeNewton and the one made by Geoffrey.

WannabeNewton said:
ChiralWaltz said:
can it revert back into superposition? how long does it take?
In theory it happens immediately after but in practical terms it depends on the characteristic time scale of the interactions in the system.

[PLAIN said:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/que...surement-stops[/PLAIN] (Geoffrey)]
"if you make another measurement of the same observable very quickly after making the first measurement (and I mean VERY quickly), you will get back the same result because the wave-function has not had time to evolve away from that state yet"

What I am seeing here is two conflicting ideas. Does the interpretation of QM vary from user to user and allow for both of these ideas to be correct?


Please let me know if I am starting to get what is going on here:
I have a particle in superposition.

I can take a measurement of position, momentum or energy. Does this mean I can only take one measurement at a time on a single particle? I would assume so due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in regards to measuring position and momentum.

Since my name is Chiral and I want to find the chirality of the particle. I do so by measuring (observing?) the momentum, correct?

Doing so collapses the wavefunction into "a Dirac delta function in the eigenbasis" (no idea what this is but I will when I get there in the math) in momentum space.

Either the particle has to wait to go back into superposition or it happens instantly.

Then I take a measurement, of which I have three choices, and the whole thing starts all over again?

Thank you for helping me understand this better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K