Permutation and combination problems.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a permutation and combination problem involving the arrangement of six people (A, B, C, D, E, F) in a row, with the condition that A, B, and C must be separated from each other. Participants are exploring the implications of this condition and the correct approach to calculating the number of valid arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different interpretations of the requirement that A, B, and C must be separated, questioning whether certain arrangements should be counted or excluded. Various methods for approaching the problem are suggested, including arranging D, E, and F first and then placing A, B, and C in the gaps created.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing different methods and reasoning. Some have provided alternative approaches to the problem, while others are seeking clarification on the conditions and calculations involved. There is no explicit consensus on a single method yet, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of understanding the implications of the phrase "must be separated" and how it affects the counting of arrangements. There is also mention of a specific numerical result (144) that some participants are trying to justify through their calculations.

kenny1999
Messages
235
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



I forget the exact expression of the questions. But the related details are exhaustive here.
it's about permutation and combination. By the way, I am not student, i am looking for explanation and understanding, not answers..

1. There are 6 people, namely A, B, C, D, E, F in a row, how many ways of arrangement are there such that person A,B,C must be separated

Homework Equations



No equation given


The Attempt at a Solution



I especially paid attention to the word "must be separate", then I first count the number of ways that A,B and C "must be grouped" together. which result in 3! (arrangement within A,B,C) and then multiply 4! (taken ABC as one object).

Then for 6 people randomly arranged in order there are 6!. It's easy.

so the solution i think should be 6! - 3! x 4!

however, that was wrong. the solution is 3! x 4!

I feel so hard understanding why.

I don't know what they mean by "must be separate" here, how about, for example, A E F B C D? when B and C are combined while A is separate from them. Did I forgot to minus this possibility?

The answer is actually 144 but I get no idea about it.


I am not really clever, please explain in a simple way. Thanks people. Thanks people
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kenny! :wink:
kenny1999 said:
I don't know what they mean by "must be separate" here, how about, for example, A E F B C D? when B and C are combined while A is separate from them. Did I forgot to minus this possibility?

yes, that's right :smile:

"separate" means no two are together

here's another way to do it:

place A B and C first, with two gaps in between (how many ways are there of doing that?)

then place D E and F (how many ways are there of doing that? you know that at least one of them has to be in the first gap)​

have another go! (both ways) :smile:
 
Another explanation:
1. Arrange D, E, F as shown -D-E-F- , there are x ways to do that.
2. Now there are 4 positions (each denoted by a dash) to place A, B, C at.
First choose 3 positions from 4, there are y ways to do that.
Then make an arrangement among 3 peoples, this could be done in z ways.
3. Multiply things out and you'll get the answer.
 
i wonder! :rolleyes:

can you calculate how many different ways are there of solving this question? :biggrin:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kenny! :wink:


yes, that's right :smile:

"separate" means no two are together

here's another way to do it:

place A B and C first, with two gaps in between (how many ways are there of doing that?)

then place D E and F (how many ways are there of doing that? you know that at least one of them has to be in the first gap)​

have another go! (both ways) :smile:

i've worked out a formula for this problem, but is the formula correct?


3!x3! + 3!x3! + 3!x3! + 3!x3! = 144
 
well, the result is correct :smile:

but what's your justification for it? :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K